Where does Deep Render Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Deep Render Ltd. ranks #11,988 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Deep Render Ltd. hold?

Deep Render Ltd. holds 25 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Deep Render Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Deep Render Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 47.1 out of 100 (top 19% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Deep Render Ltd. focus on?

Deep Render Ltd.'s top technology area is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television) with 25 patents, ranking #654 of 5,951 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Deep Render Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Deep Render Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +950% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Deep Render Ltd.'s patents?

Deep Render Ltd.'s patents average 14.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Deep Render Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Deep Render Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Deep ranks #11,988 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 4 technology areas.

#11,988
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 19%
by Innovation Score (47.1/100): 14.6
avg claims per patent: +950%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11988 · Foreign Corporation #11,988 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
UPPER-Q #11,988/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Croda
CPC-NARROW H04N · 4 areas
INNOV-PAR 47.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +950% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Croda, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Deep’s 47.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.3 pts (24%) Velocity 20.0 pts (42%) Breadth 7.1 pts (15%) Claim depth 8.8 pts (19%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Airbus DS · near

47
BAE Systems Bofors AB · near

47
Daiki · near

47
Deep Render · this assignee

47
Server Technology · near

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Deep's Innovation Score is 47.1/100 (top 19% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Deep?

Each dot is one of Deep’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Deep’s own 14.6 claims/patent is at or below the 15.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Deep vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Deep's grants concentrate

Deep Render Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (14 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Deep sits between Croda, Inc. and DataRobot, Inc..

Deep's three-year grant acceleration

Deep Render Ltd. shows 21 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Croda

25
Cytosorbents

25
Dana TM4

25
DEB IP

25
Dong-a University…

25
DY Auto

25
Dystar Colours Di…

25
Datarobot

25
Deep Render ◀

25

What this shows Deep holds 25 patents at rank #11,985, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Deep

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,985 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Deep's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Deep, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04N (Pictorial Communication), Deep ranks #654 of 5,951 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (47 here).

BAE Systems Bofors AB 47 Daiki Co., Ltd. 47 Server Technology, Inc. 47 Airbus DS GMBH 47

Deep's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 19% higher than 81% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Deep Render Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	8.0%
2022	1	4.0%
2023	6	24.0%
2024	14	56.0%
2025partial year	2	8.0%

Which technologies does Deep Render Ltd. patent most?

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 25

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 22

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 22

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 16

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Deep Render Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Deep Render Ltd.'s lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
Ranked #11,988 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Deep Render Ltd. against Croda, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 47.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.