Deep Instinct
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Deep ranks #46,075 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #46,075
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 27th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.3/100)
- 29.2
- avg claims per patent
- +300%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R46075 · Foreign Corporation #46,075 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #46,075/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Dean Technology
- CPC-NARROW G06N · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 29.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +300% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Dean Technology Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Deep’s 28.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Deep
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Deep Instinct · this assignee 28
Deep Instinct · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Deep's Innovation Score is 28.3/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Deep?
Each dot is one of Deep’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Deep’s own 29.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Deep's grants concentrate
Deep Instinct is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Deep sits between Dean Technology Inc. and Defendtex PTY Ltd.
Who files at Deep's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Dean Technology
Dean Technology Inc.
5 patents
- Deborah A Lambert…
Deborah A. Lambert AS Trustee OF THE Deborah A. Lambert Irrevocable Trust FOR Mark Lambert
5 patents
- Debregeas ET Asso…
Debregeas ET Associes Pharma
5 patents
- Decon7 Systems
Decon7 Systems, LLC
5 patents
- Deepinfar Ocean T…
Deepinfar Ocean Technology Inc.
5 patents
- Deepqure
Deepqure Inc.
5 patents
- Deepwell DTX
Deepwell DTX
5 patents
- Defendtex PTY
Defendtex PTY Ltd
5 patents
- Deep Instinct ◀
Deep Instinct
5 patents
What this shows Deep holds 5 patents at rank #46,050, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Deep
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,050 in granted patent volume.
- Dean Technology Inc. #46,046 · 5 patents
- Deborah A. Lambert AS Trustee OF THE Deborah A. Lambert Irrevocable Trust FOR Mark Lambert #46,047 · 5 patents
- Debregeas ET Associes Pharma #46,048 · 5 patents
- Decon7 Systems, LLC #46,049 · 5 patents
- Deepinfar Ocean Technology Inc. #46,051 · 5 patents
- Deepqure Inc. #46,052 · 5 patents
- Deepwell DTX #46,053 · 5 patents
- Defendtex PTY Ltd #46,054 · 5 patents
Leaders in G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Deep's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 7,479 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 2,485 in class
- Google LLC 2,475 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 1,480 in class
- Capital ONE Services, LLC 1,386 in class
- Intel Corporation 1,333 in class
- Adobe Inc. 989 in class
- Bank of America Corporation 877 in class
Deep's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Deep Instinct patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Deep Instinct's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Deep Instinct's lead technology class is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06N
- Ranked #46,075 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Deep Instinct against Dean Technology Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.