David & Young Group Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, David ranks #31,370 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #31,370
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 21st percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.8/100)
- 1.4
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31370 · US Corporation #31,370 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,370/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH DATA:)COMM
- CPC-NARROW A45C · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.8/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: DATA:)COMM Electronics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How David’s 26.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around David
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- David & Young Group · this assignee 27
David & Young Group · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows David's Innovation Score is 26.8/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for David?
Each dot is one of David’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). David’s own 1.4 claims/patent is at or below the 11.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where David's grants concentrate
David & Young Group Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 12.5% of grants classified under A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, David sits between DATA:)COMM Electronics, Inc. and Deca System, Inc..
David's three-year grant acceleration
David & Young Group Corp. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at David's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- DATA:)COMM
DATA:)COMM Electronics, Inc.
8 patents
- Datafeel
Datafeel Inc.
8 patents
- Datawatch
Datawatch Corporation
8 patents
- Davco Technology
Davco Technology, LLC
8 patents
- Dcseng
Dcseng Co. Ltd.
8 patents
- DE Motu Cordis PTY
DE Motu Cordis PTY Ltd
8 patents
- DE WET Plant Bree…
DE WET Plant Breeders
8 patents
- Deca System
Deca System, Inc.
8 patents
- David & Young Gro… ◀
David & Young Group Corp.
8 patents
What this shows David holds 8 patents at rank #31,364, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near David
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,364 in granted patent volume.
- DATA:)COMM Electronics, Inc. #31,360 · 8 patents
- Datafeel Inc. #31,361 · 8 patents
- Datawatch Corporation #31,362 · 8 patents
- Davco Technology, LLC #31,363 · 8 patents
- Dcseng Co. Ltd. #31,365 · 8 patents
- DE Motu Cordis PTY Ltd #31,366 · 8 patents
- DE WET Plant Breeders #31,367 · 8 patents
- Deca System, Inc. #31,368 · 8 patents
Leaders in A45C (Purses)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in David's primary technology class.
David's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does David & Young Group Corp. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
David & Young Group Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- David & Young Group Corp.'s lead technology class is A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags), 12.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45C
- Ranked #31,370 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare David & Young Group Corp. against DATA:)COMM Electronics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.