Overall rank by patents
#31,364
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; HAND CARRIED BAGS).
The verdict
David holds 8 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #31,364 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
David & Young Group Corp. has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing David & Young Group Corp. at rank #31,364 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 1.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; HAND CARRIED BAGS). As a US Corporation, David & Young Group Corp. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, David sits between Data:)comm Electronics, Inc. (8 patents, rank #31,360) and DECA System, Inc. (8 patents, rank #31,368) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 26.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 6 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +200% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. David & Young Group Corp.'s 1.4 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark David & Young Group Corp. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
DATA:)COMM ELECTRONICS, INC.
8 patents
DATAFEEL INC.
8 patents
DATAWATCH CORPORATION
8 patents
DAVCO Technology, LLC
8 patents
DCSENG CO. LTD.
8 patents
DE MOTU CORDIS PTY LTD
8 patents
DE WET PLANT BREEDERS
8 patents
DECA SYSTEM, INC.
8 patents
DAVID & YOUNG GROUP CORP.
8 patents
What this shows David holds 8 patents at rank #31,364, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,364 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in David's primary technology class.
David's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 Top 79% higher than 21% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2025 | 4 | 50.0% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#31,364
Across all tracked assignees
26.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
David's 8 grants land it in the top 79% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.