USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cytodyn Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07K (Peptides).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cytodyn ranks #34,926 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.

#34,926
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
25th percentile
by Innovation Score (27.7/100)
15.0
avg claims per patent
+33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R34926 · US Corporation #34,926 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • MID-PACK #34,926/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cybrook
  • CPC-NARROW C07K · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 27.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-UP +33% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cybrook Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cytodyn’s 27.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cytodyn

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Cytodyn's Innovation Score is 27.7/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cytodyn?

Each dot is one of Cytodyn’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cytodyn’s own 15.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cytodyn vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 01020304050 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cybrook Inc. - 7, 19CybrookCyera, Ltd. - 7, 17.14CyeraCygnus Medical, LLC - 7, 16.14Cygnus MedicalCynetic Designs Ltd. - 7, 40.14Cynetic DesignsCytune Pharma - 7, 10.86Cytune PharmaD. R. Nano Co., Ltd. - 7, 10.14D R NanoD.F. Omer Ltd - 7, 1D F OmerD3F, LLC - 7, 1D3FCytodyn Inc. - 7, 15Cytodyn
Cytodyn vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cytodyn's grants concentrate

Cytodyn Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C07K (Peptides). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Cytodyn sits between Cybrook Inc. and D3F, LLC.

Cytodyn's three-year grant acceleration

Cytodyn Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Cytodyn's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cytodyn holds 7 patents at rank #34,923, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cytodyn

By rank, the assignees closest to #34,923 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C07K (Peptides)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cytodyn's primary technology class.

Cytodyn's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 201620182019202020212023 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cytodyn Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 14.3%
2018 1 14.3%
2019 1 14.3%
2020 1 14.3%
2021 1 14.3%
2023 2 28.6%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Cytodyn Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Cytodyn Inc.'s lead technology class is C07K (Peptides), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C07K
  • Ranked #34,926 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Cytodyn Inc. against Cybrook Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 27.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.