Cypress Lake Software, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cypress ranks #22,434 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #22,434
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 33rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.0/100)
- 74.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R22434 · US Corporation #22,434 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #22,434/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH CraniUS
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.0/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 74.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: CraniUS LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cypress’s 30.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cypress
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cypress Lake Software · this assignee 30
Cypress Lake Software · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cypress's Innovation Score is 30.0/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cypress?
Each dot is one of Cypress’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cypress’s own 74.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cypress's grants concentrate
Cypress Lake Software, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Cypress sits between CraniUS LLC and Damballa, Inc..
Who files at Cypress's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cranius
CraniUS LLC
12 patents
- Curio Holding
Curio Holding Company
12 patents
- Cyan Systems
Cyan Systems
12 patents
- Cycling Sports Gr…
Cycling Sports Group, Inc.
12 patents
- D C Water and Sew…
D.C. Water and Sewer Authority
12 patents
- D3 Semiconductor
D3 Semiconductor LLC
12 patents
- Dainichi
Dainichi Co., Ltd.
12 patents
- Damballa
Damballa, Inc.
12 patents
- Cypress Lake Soft… ◀
Cypress Lake Software, Inc.
12 patents
What this shows Cypress holds 12 patents at rank #22,434, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cypress
By rank, the assignees closest to #22,434 in granted patent volume.
- CraniUS LLC #22,430 · 12 patents
- Curio Holding Company #22,431 · 12 patents
- Cyan Systems #22,432 · 12 patents
- Cycling Sports Group, Inc. #22,433 · 12 patents
- D.C. Water and Sewer Authority #22,435 · 12 patents
- D3 Semiconductor LLC #22,436 · 12 patents
- Dainichi Co., Ltd. #22,437 · 12 patents
- Damballa, Inc. #22,438 · 12 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cypress's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Cypress's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 4 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2019 | 4 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Cypress Lake Software, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cypress Lake Software, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cypress Lake Software, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #22,434 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cypress Lake Software, Inc. against CraniUS LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.