Where does Custom Metalcraft, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Custom Metalcraft, Inc. ranks #34,911 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Custom Metalcraft, Inc. hold?

Custom Metalcraft, Inc. holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Custom Metalcraft, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Custom Metalcraft, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 36.2 out of 100 (top 47% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Custom Metalcraft, Inc. focus on?

Custom Metalcraft, Inc.'s top technology area is B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 4 patents, ranking #136 of 469 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Custom Metalcraft, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Custom Metalcraft, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Custom Metalcraft, Inc.'s patents?

Custom Metalcraft, Inc.'s patents average 6.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Custom Metalcraft, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Custom Metalcraft, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Custom ranks #34,911 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 2 technology areas.

#34,911
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 47%
by Innovation Score (36.2/100): 6.7
avg claims per patent: +33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R34911 · US Corporation #34,911 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #34,911/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Curb Roller
CPC-NARROW B67D · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 36.2/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Curb Roller LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Custom’s 36.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (20%) Velocity 20.0 pts (55%) Breadth 5.0 pts (14%) Claim depth 4.0 pts (11%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Custom Metalcraft · this assignee

36
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Custom's Innovation Score is 36.2/100 (top 47% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Custom?

Each dot is one of Custom’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Custom’s own 6.7 claims/patent is at or below the 15.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Custom vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Custom's grants concentrate

Custom Metalcraft, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Custom sits between Curb Roller LLC and Cybrook Inc..

Custom's three-year grant acceleration

Custom Metalcraft, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Curb Roller

7
Currentwrx

7
Curtis Instruments

7
Cuseum

7
Cutting Edge Pack…

7
Cybeye

7
Cybin UK

7
Cybrook

7
Custom Metalcraft ◀

7

What this shows Custom holds 7 patents at rank #34,915, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Custom

By rank, the assignees closest to #34,915 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B67D (Dispensing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Custom's primary technology class.

Custom's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 47% higher than 53% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Custom Metalcraft, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	14.3%
2016	1	14.3%
2017	1	14.3%
2021	1	14.3%
2022	1	14.3%
2023	2	28.6%

Which technologies does Custom Metalcraft, Inc. patent most?

B67D - Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 4

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Custom Metalcraft, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Custom Metalcraft, Inc.'s lead technology class is B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B67D
Ranked #34,911 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Custom Metalcraft, Inc. against Curb Roller LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 36.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.