Overall rank by patents
#39,285
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, active 2024–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F16C (SHAFTS; FLEXIBLE SHAFTS; ELEMENTS OR CRANKSHAFT MECHANISMS; ROTARY BODIES OTHER THAN GEARING ELEMENTS; BEARINGS).
The verdict
C&u holds 6 US patents across 3 technology areas, rank #39,285 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
C&U Company Limited. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2024 and 2024, placing C&U Company Limited. at rank #39,285 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 3 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 8.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16C (SHAFTS; FLEXIBLE SHAFTS; ELEMENTS OR CRANKSHAFT MECHANISMS; ROTARY BODIES OTHER THAN GEARING ELEMENTS; BEARINGS). As a Foreign Corporation, C&U Company Limited. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, C&u sits between C & J Clark International Limited (6 patents, rank #39,281) and C.r.d. Centro Ricerche Ducati Trento S.r.l. (6 patents, rank #39,289) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 37.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2024 through 2024, with 6 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. C&U Company Limited.'s 8.0 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 3 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark C&U Company Limited. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
C & J CLARK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
6 patents
C Laser, Inc.
6 patents
C&C INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.
6 patents
C&M BALING SYSTEMS, INC.
6 patents
C.C. Imex
6 patents
C.C.P.CONTACT PROBES CO., LTD.
6 patents
C.G. AIR SYSTÈMES INC.
6 patents
C.R.D. Centro Ricerche Ducati Trento S.r.l.
6 patents
C&U COMPANY LIMITED.
6 patents
What this shows C&U holds 6 patents at rank #39,285, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,285 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in C&U's primary technology class.
C&u's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 43% higher than 57% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2024–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 100.0% |
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#39,285
Across all tracked assignees
37.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
C&u's 6 grants land it in the top 43% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.