Overall rank by patents
#45,675
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2016–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F25B (REFRIGERATION MACHINES, PLANTS OR SYSTEMS; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS).
The verdict
CSIC holds 5 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #45,675 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
CSIC Pride (nanjing) Cryogenic Technology Co., Ltd. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2016 and 2024, placing CSIC Pride (nanjing) Cryogenic Technology Co., Ltd. at rank #45,675 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 9.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in F25B (REFRIGERATION MACHINES, PLANTS OR SYSTEMS; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS). As a Foreign Corporation, CSIC Pride (nanjing) Cryogenic Technology Co., Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, CSIC sits between CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co., Ltd. (5 patents, rank #45,671) and CTEK Sweden AB (5 patents, rank #45,679) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 39.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +50% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. CSIC Pride (nanjing) Cryogenic Technology Co., Ltd.'s 9.6 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark CSIC Pride (nanjing) Cryogenic Technology Co., Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
CRRC ZHUZHOU LOCOMOTIVE CO., LTD.
5 patents
CS Tech Holdings LLC
5 patents
CSG Systems, Inc.
5 patents
CSI ENTERPRISES, INC.
5 patents
CSL Behring Gene Therapy, Inc.
5 patents
CSP Inc.
5 patents
CTC—Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira S.A.
5 patents
CTEK Sweden AB
5 patents
CSIC PRIDE (NANJING) CRYOGENIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
5 patents
What this shows CSIC holds 5 patents at rank #45,675, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,675 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CSIC's primary technology class.
CSIC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 37% higher than 63% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 3 | 60.0% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#45,675
Across all tracked assignees
39.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
CSIC's 5 grants land it in the top 37% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.