Where does Crypto LAB Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Crypto LAB Inc. ranks #13,372 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Crypto LAB Inc. hold?

Crypto LAB Inc. holds 22 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Crypto LAB Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Crypto LAB Inc. has an Innovation Score of 37.4 out of 100 (top 44% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Crypto LAB Inc. focus on?

Crypto LAB Inc.'s top technology area is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication) with 21 patents, ranking #1,302 of 8,956 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Crypto LAB Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Crypto LAB Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Crypto LAB Inc.'s patents?

Crypto LAB Inc.'s patents average 10.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Crypto LAB Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Crypto LAB Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Crypto ranks #13,372 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 5 technology areas.

#13,372
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 44%
by Innovation Score (37.4/100): 10.7
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13372 · Foreign Corporation #13,372 · 22 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
MID-PACK #13,372/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Canada Pipeline…
CPC-NARROW H04L · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.4/100
CLAIMS-PAR 10.7 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Canada Pipeline Accessories Company, Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Crypto’s 37.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.8 pts (29%) Velocity 12.2 pts (33%) Breadth 7.9 pts (21%) Claim depth 6.4 pts (17%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Crypto LAB · this assignee

37
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Crypto's Innovation Score is 37.4/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Crypto?

Each dot is one of Crypto’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Crypto’s own 10.7 claims/patent is at or below the 12.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Crypto vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Crypto's grants concentrate

Crypto LAB Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 95.5% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Crypto sits between Concraft Holding Co., Ltd. and Cardiac Implants LLC.

Crypto's three-year grant acceleration

Crypto LAB Inc. shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Concraft Holding

22
Constellium Singen

22
Cqlt Saargummi S…

22
Cressi-sub S P A

22
Crystal Pharmaceu…

22
Canada Pipeline A…

22
Carbon Black

22
Cardiac Implants

22
Crypto LAB ◀

22

What this shows Crypto holds 22 patents at rank #13,356, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Crypto

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,356 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Crypto's primary technology class.

Crypto's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Crypto LAB Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	4.5%
2021	5	22.7%
2022	5	22.7%
2023	3	13.6%
2024	3	13.6%
2025partial year	5	22.7%

Which technologies does Crypto LAB Inc. patent most?

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 21

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 7

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 1

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 1

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Crypto LAB Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Crypto LAB Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 95.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
Ranked #13,372 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Crypto LAB Inc. against Concraft Holding Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.