Cribl, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cribl ranks #28,505 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #28,505
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 25%
- by Innovation Score (44.8/100)
- 19.8
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28505 · US Corporation #28,505 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #28,505/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Coveris Flexibles US
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-PAR 44.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Coveris Flexibles US LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cribl’s 44.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cribl
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cribl · this assignee
Cribl · this assignee
45 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cribl's Innovation Score is 44.8/100 (top 25% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cribl?
Each dot is one of Cribl’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cribl’s own 19.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cribl's grants concentrate
Cribl, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Cribl sits between Coveris Flexibles US LLC and Cuesta Technology Holdings, LLC.
Cribl's three-year grant acceleration
Cribl, Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Cribl's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Coveris Flexibles…
Coveris Flexibles US LLC
9 patents
- Crea IP B V
Crea IP B.V.
9 patents
- Create A Castle
Create A Castle, LLC
9 patents
- Credibility
Credibility, LLC
9 patents
- Critical Tattoo S…
Critical Tattoo Supply, LLC
9 patents
- Crorama
Crorama Inc.
9 patents
- Crystal Group
Crystal Group, Inc.
9 patents
- Cuesta Technology…
Cuesta Technology Holdings, LLC
9 patents
- Cribl ◀
Cribl, Inc.
9 patents
What this shows Cribl holds 9 patents at rank #28,511, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cribl
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,511 in granted patent volume.
- Coveris Flexibles US LLC #28,507 · 9 patents
- Crea IP B.V. #28,508 · 9 patents
- Create A Castle, LLC #28,509 · 9 patents
- Credibility, LLC #28,510 · 9 patents
- Critical Tattoo Supply, LLC #28,512 · 9 patents
- Crorama Inc. #28,513 · 9 patents
- Crystal Group, Inc. #28,514 · 9 patents
- Cuesta Technology Holdings, LLC #28,515 · 9 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cribl's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Cribl's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 25% higher than 75% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 4 | 44.4% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 44.4% |
Which technologies does Cribl, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cribl, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cribl, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #28,505 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cribl, Inc. against Coveris Flexibles US LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 44.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.