Where does Craxel, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Craxel, Inc. ranks #26,068 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Craxel, Inc. hold?

Craxel, Inc. holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2024, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Craxel, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Craxel, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 48.3 out of 100 (top 17% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Craxel, Inc. focus on?

Craxel, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING) with 10 patents. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Craxel, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Craxel, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +300% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Craxel, Inc.'s patents?

Craxel, Inc.'s patents average 41.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Craxel, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Craxel, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Craxel ranks #26,068 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 2 technology areas.

#26,068
of 50,000 US assignees by volume: Top 17%
by Innovation Score (48.3/100): 41.7
avg claims per patent: +300%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R26068 · US Corporation #26,068 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #26,068/50,000
PHOTO-FINISH Coreshell Incorporated
CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
INNOV-PAR 48.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 41.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +300% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Coreshell Technologies, Incorporated (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Craxel · this assignee

48
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest

7

What this shows Craxel's Innovation Score is 48.3/100 (top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Where Craxel's grants concentrate

Craxel, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Craxel sits between Coreshell Technologies, Incorporated and Crown Products & Services, Inc..

Craxel's three-year grant acceleration

Craxel, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Coreshell Incorpo…

10
Cork Group Trading

10
Covalon

10
Cranemasters

10
Cray UK

10
Creanova Universa…

10
Cristel

10
Crown Products &…

10
Craxel ◀

10

What this shows Craxel holds 10 patents at rank #26,074, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Craxel

By rank, the assignees closest to #26,074 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital DATA Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Craxel's primary technology class.

Craxel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 50,000 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Craxel, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	10.0%
2019	1	10.0%
2020	1	10.0%
2022	1	10.0%
2023	2	20.0%
2024	4	40.0%

Which technologies does Craxel, Inc. patent most?

G06F - ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING 10

H04L - TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION 3

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#26,068

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

48.3 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.