Cougar Creek Technologies, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cougar ranks #31,305 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #31,305
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 15%
- by Innovation Score (49.4/100)
- 18.6
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31305 · US Corporation #31,305 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,305/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH CORSIGHT AI
- CPC-NARROW H01M · 9 areas
- INNOV-PAR 49.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2024 · 2y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: CORSIGHT.AI (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cougar’s 49.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cougar
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cougar Creek · this assignee
Cougar Creek · this assignee
49 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cougar's Innovation Score is 49.4/100 (top 15% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cougar?
Each dot is one of Cougar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cougar’s own 18.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cougar's grants concentrate
Cougar Creek Technologies, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2024. By volume, Cougar sits between CORSIGHT.AI and Cqens Technologies Inc..
Cougar's three-year grant acceleration
Cougar Creek Technologies, LLC shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Cougar's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Corsight AI
CORSIGHT.AI
8 patents
- Cosda Manufacturi…
Cosda Manufacturing Company
8 patents
- Cosmo Koki
Cosmo Koki Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Cossington
Cossington Limited
8 patents
- Coval
COVAL
8 patents
- CP Studios
CP Studios LLC
8 patents
- CPC
CPC AG
8 patents
- Cqens
Cqens Technologies Inc.
8 patents
- Cougar Creek ◀
Cougar Creek Technologies, LLC
8 patents
What this shows Cougar holds 8 patents at rank #31,211, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cougar
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,211 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cougar's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,657 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 3,097 in class
- LG Chem, Ltd. 2,369 in class
- LG Energy Solution, Ltd. 2,086 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 1,418 in class
- Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. 1,278 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 1,185 in class
- Robert Bosch GmbH 1,074 in class
Cougar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
49 Top 15% higher than 85% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 75.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does Cougar Creek Technologies, LLC patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cougar Creek Technologies, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cougar Creek Technologies, LLC's lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
- Ranked #31,305 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cougar Creek Technologies, LLC against CORSIGHT.AI, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 49.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.