Overall rank by patents
#31,329
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2022–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS).
The verdict
Coretrax holds 8 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #31,329 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Coretrax Americas Ltd. has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2022 and 2025, placing Coretrax Americas Ltd. at rank #31,329 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS). As a US Corporation, Coretrax Americas Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Coretrax sits between Copeland Europe Gmbh (8 patents, rank #31,325) and Cotiviti, Inc. (8 patents, rank #31,333) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 39.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2022 through 2025, with 8 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Coretrax Americas Ltd.'s 11.8 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Coretrax Americas Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Copeland Europe GmbH
8 patents
Copper John Corporation
8 patents
Core-Arms, LLC
8 patents
Corephotonics Lid.
8 patents
Corista, LLC
8 patents
Cornerstone Automation Systems, LLC
8 patents
Costa Farms, LLC
8 patents
Cotiviti, Inc.
8 patents
Coretrax Americas Ltd.
8 patents
What this shows Coretrax holds 8 patents at rank #31,329, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,329 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Coretrax's primary technology class.
Coretrax's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 38% higher than 62% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2023 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2025 | 1 | 12.5% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#31,329
Across all tracked assignees
39.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Coretrax's 8 grants land it in the top 38% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.