Where does Consulting Engineers, Corp. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Consulting Engineers, Corp. ranks #31,279 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Consulting Engineers, Corp. hold?

Consulting Engineers, Corp. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2024, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Consulting Engineers, Corp.'s Innovation Score?

Consulting Engineers, Corp. has an Innovation Score of 45.8 out of 100 (top 22% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Consulting Engineers, Corp. focus on?

Consulting Engineers, Corp.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 7 patents, ranking #4,773 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Consulting Engineers, Corp.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Consulting Engineers, Corp..

What does claim depth mean for Consulting Engineers, Corp.'s patents?

Consulting Engineers, Corp.'s patents average 13.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Consulting Engineers, Corp. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Consulting Engineers, Corp.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Consulting ranks #31,279 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 8 technology areas.

#31,279
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 22%
by Innovation Score (45.8/100): 13.8
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R31279 · US Corporation #31,279 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #31,279/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Comsys AB
CPC-NARROW G06F · 8 areas
INNOV-PAR 45.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Comsys AB (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Consulting’s 45.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (17%) Velocity 20.0 pts (44%) Breadth 10.0 pts (22%) Claim depth 8.3 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Consulting Engineers · this assignee

46
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Consulting's Innovation Score is 45.8/100 (top 22% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Consulting?

Each dot is one of Consulting’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Consulting’s own 13.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Consulting vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Consulting's grants concentrate

Consulting Engineers, Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Consulting sits between Comsys AB and Cook Regentec LLC.

Consulting's three-year grant acceleration

Consulting Engineers, Corp. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Comsys AB

8
Confidex Oy

8
Confluence Outdoor

8
Confluent Surgical

8
Contraline

8
Control Dynamics

8
Convergent R N R

8
Cook Regentec

8
Consulting Engine… ◀

8

What this shows Consulting holds 8 patents at rank #31,319, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Consulting

By rank, the assignees closest to #31,319 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Consulting's primary technology class.

Consulting's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 22% higher than 78% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Consulting Engineers, Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	12.5%
2022	5	62.5%
2023	1	12.5%
2024	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Consulting Engineers, Corp. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 7

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 6

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 6

E04C - Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials 4

G01B - Measuring Length, Thickness OR Similar Linear DIMENSIONS; Measuring ANGLES; Measuring AREAS; Measuring Irregularities OF Surfaces OR Contours 3

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 3

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

E04B - General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Consulting Engineers, Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Consulting Engineers, Corp.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #31,279 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Consulting Engineers, Corp. against Comsys AB, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 45.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.