Where does Confluent, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Confluent, Inc. ranks #22,413 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Confluent, Inc. hold?

Confluent, Inc. holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Confluent, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Confluent, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 44.6 out of 100 (top 25% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Confluent, Inc. focus on?

Confluent, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 10 patents, ranking #3,601 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Confluent, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Confluent, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +200% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Confluent, Inc.'s patents?

Confluent, Inc.'s patents average 17.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Confluent, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Confluent, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Confluent ranks #22,413 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 2 technology areas.

#22,413
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 25%
by Innovation Score (44.6/100): 17.9
avg claims per patent: +200%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R22413 · US Corporation #22,413 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #22,413/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Companion Labs
CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
INNOV-PAR 44.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +200% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Companion Labs, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Confluent’s 44.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (20%) Velocity 20.0 pts (45%) Breadth 5.0 pts (11%) Claim depth 10.8 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Confluent · this assignee

45
Firestone Building… · near

45
Integrity Implants · near

45
THE Watt Stopper · near

45
Zipline International · near

45
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Confluent's Innovation Score is 44.6/100 (top 25% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Confluent?

Each dot is one of Confluent’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Confluent’s own 17.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Confluent vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Confluent's grants concentrate

Confluent, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, Confluent sits between Companion Labs, Inc. and CraniUS LLC.

Confluent's three-year grant acceleration

Confluent, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Companion Labs

12
Concordia Univers…

12
Concrete Countert…

12
Conectric

12
Continental Intel…

12
Coresyte

12
Cottrell

12
Cranius

12
Confluent ◀

12

What this shows Confluent holds 12 patents at rank #22,426, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Confluent

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,426 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Confluent's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Confluent, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Confluent ranks #3,601 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (45 here).

Zipline International Inc. 45 Integrity Implants Inc. 45 THE Watt Stopper, Inc. 45 Firestone Building Products Company, LLC 45

Confluent's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

45 Top 25% higher than 75% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Confluent, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	16.7%
2023	2	16.7%
2024	4	33.3%
2025partial year	4	33.3%

Which technologies does Confluent, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 10

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 4

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Confluent, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Confluent, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #22,413 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Confluent, Inc. against Companion Labs, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 44.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.