Concurrent Technologies Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 26 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Concurrent ranks #16,699 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 26 technology areas.
- #16,699
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 17%
- by Innovation Score (48.0/100)
- 14.9
- avg claims per patent
- -11%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R16699 · US Corporation #16,699 · 17 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
- MID-PACK #16,699/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cognizant TriZetto…
- CPC-FOCUS H01M · 26 areas
- INNOV-PAR 48.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -11% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Concurrent’s 48.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Concurrent
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Concurrent · this assignee
Concurrent · this assignee
48 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Concurrent's Innovation Score is 48.0/100 (top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Concurrent?
Each dot is one of Concurrent’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Concurrent’s own 14.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Concurrent's grants concentrate
Concurrent Technologies Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 26 CPC subclasses with 29.4% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Concurrent sits between Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc. and Country Casual Teak, Inc..
Concurrent's three-year grant acceleration
Concurrent Technologies Corporation shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Concurrent's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cognizant Trizett…
Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc.
17 patents
- Cold Jet
Cold Jet, LLC
17 patents
- College of Willia…
College of William & Mary
17 patents
- Colorado Seminary…
Colorado Seminary Which Owns and Operates The University of Denver
17 patents
- Contitech Luftfed…
ContiTech Luftfedersysteme GmbH
17 patents
- Contitech Vibrati…
ContiTech Vibration Control GmbH
17 patents
- Coreline Soft
Coreline Soft Co., Ltd.
17 patents
- Country Casual Te…
Country Casual Teak, Inc.
17 patents
- Concurrent ◀
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
17 patents
What this shows Concurrent holds 17 patents at rank #16,709, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Concurrent
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,709 in granted patent volume.
- Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc. #16,705 · 17 patents
- Cold Jet, LLC #16,706 · 17 patents
- College of William & Mary #16,707 · 17 patents
- Colorado Seminary Which Owns and Operates The University of Denver #16,708 · 17 patents
- ContiTech Luftfedersysteme GmbH #16,710 · 17 patents
- ContiTech Vibration Control GmbH #16,711 · 17 patents
- Coreline Soft Co., Ltd. #16,712 · 17 patents
- Country Casual Teak, Inc. #16,713 · 17 patents
Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Concurrent's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,657 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 3,097 in class
- LG Chem, Ltd. 2,369 in class
- LG Energy Solution, Ltd. 2,086 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 1,418 in class
- Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. 1,278 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 1,185 in class
- Robert Bosch GmbH 1,074 in class
Concurrent's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 17.6% |
| 2016 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2017 | 4 | 23.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 5.9% |
| 2021 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2022 | 4 | 23.5% |
| 2023 | 1 | 5.9% |
Which technologies does Concurrent Technologies Corporation patent most?
Top 15 of 26 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Concurrent Technologies Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Concurrent Technologies Corporation's lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 29.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
- Ranked #16,699 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Concurrent Technologies Corporation against Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 48.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.