USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Concurrent Technologies Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 26 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Concurrent ranks #16,699 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 26 technology areas.

#16,699
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 17%
by Innovation Score (48.0/100)
14.9
avg claims per patent
-11%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16699 · US Corporation #16,699 · 17 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
  • MID-PACK #16,699/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cognizant TriZetto…
  • CPC-FOCUS H01M · 26 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 48.0/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 14.9 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DOWN -11% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Concurrent’s 48.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Concurrent

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Concurrent's Innovation Score is 48.0/100 (top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Concurrent?

Each dot is one of Concurrent’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Concurrent’s own 14.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Concurrent vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 16.916.91717.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc. - 17, 14.18Cognizant Trizett…Cold Jet, LLC - 17, 8.06Cold JetCollege of William & Mary - 17, 15.76College of Willia…Colorado Seminary Which Owns and Operates The University of Denver - 17, 15.35Colorado Seminary…ContiTech Luftfedersysteme GmbH - 17, 12.24Contitech Luftfed…ContiTech Vibration Control GmbH - 17, 12.88Contitech Vibrati…Coreline Soft Co., Ltd. - 17, 13.29Coreline SoftCountry Casual Teak, Inc. - 17, 1Country Casual Te…Concurrent Technologies Corporation - 17, 14.88Concurrent
Concurrent vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Concurrent's grants concentrate

Concurrent Technologies Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 26 CPC subclasses with 29.4% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Concurrent sits between Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc. and Country Casual Teak, Inc..

Concurrent's three-year grant acceleration

Concurrent Technologies Corporation shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Concurrent's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Concurrent holds 17 patents at rank #16,709, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Concurrent

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,709 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Concurrent's primary technology class.

Concurrent's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 2015201620172020202120222023 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Concurrent Technologies Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 17.6%
2016 2 11.8%
2017 4 23.5%
2020 1 5.9%
2021 2 11.8%
2022 4 23.5%
2023 1 5.9%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Concurrent Technologies Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Concurrent Technologies Corporation's lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 29.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
  • Ranked #16,699 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Concurrent Technologies Corporation against Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 48.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.