Where does Concurrent Computer Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Concurrent Computer Corporation ranks #34,829 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Concurrent Computer Corporation hold?

Concurrent Computer Corporation holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Concurrent Computer Corporation's Innovation Score?

Concurrent Computer Corporation has an Innovation Score of 29.6 out of 100 (31st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Concurrent Computer Corporation focus on?

Concurrent Computer Corporation's top technology area is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television) with 7 patents, ranking #1,686 of 5,951 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Concurrent Computer Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Concurrent Computer Corporation's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Concurrent Computer Corporation's patents?

Concurrent Computer Corporation's patents average 22.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Concurrent Computer Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Concurrent Computer Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Concurrent ranks #34,829 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 6 technology areas.

#34,829
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 31st percentile
by Innovation Score (29.6/100): 22.9
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R34829 · US Corporation #34,829 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #34,829/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Composite Internatio…
CPC-NARROW H04N · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 29.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Composite Technologies International, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Concurrent’s 29.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (24%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 8.7 pts (29%) Claim depth 13.7 pts (46%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Concurrent Computer · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Concurrent's Innovation Score is 29.6/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Concurrent?

Each dot is one of Concurrent’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Concurrent’s own 22.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Concurrent vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Concurrent's grants concentrate

Concurrent Computer Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Concurrent sits between Composite Technologies International, LLC and Consider Provisions, LLC.

Composite Interna…

7
Comprehensive Bio…

7
Compressor Contro…

7
Contipi Medical

7
Confluent Medical

7
Confluera

7
Conscience Inform…

7
Consider Provisio…

7
Concurrent Comput… ◀

7

What this shows Concurrent holds 7 patents at rank #34,869, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Concurrent

By rank, the assignees closest to #34,869 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Concurrent's primary technology class.

Concurrent's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Concurrent Computer Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	42.9%
2016	2	28.6%
2018	2	28.6%

Which technologies does Concurrent Computer Corporation patent most?

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 7

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 3

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

H04H - Broadcast Communication 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Concurrent Computer Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Concurrent Computer Corporation's lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
Ranked #34,829 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Concurrent Computer Corporation against Composite Technologies International, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.