PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Computer ranks #28,468 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 5 technology areas.

#28,468
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 31%
by Innovation Score (42.1/100)
10.3
avg claims per patent
-40%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28468 · Foreign Corporation #28,468 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #28,468/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Codiak Biosciences
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 5 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 42.1/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 10.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DOWN -40% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Codiak Biosciences, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Computer’s 42.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Computer

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Computer's Innovation Score is 42.1/100 (top 31% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Computer?

Each dot is one of Computer’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Computer’s own 10.3 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Computer vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Codiak Biosciences, Inc. - 9, 14.67Codiak BiosciencesComba Network Systems Company Limited - 9, 13.56Comba Network Sys…Compagnie Mediterraneenne DES Cafes - 9, 17.11Compagnie Mediter…Compressor Products International, LLC - 9, 10.89Compressor Produc…Comsonics, Inc. - 9, 21.22ComsonicsConavi Medical Inc. - 9, 23Conavi MedicalConsortium DE Recherche BRP—UNIVERSITE DE Sherbrooke S.E.N.C. - 9, 13.56Consortium DE Rec…Convenientpower HK Limited - 9, 16.56Convenientpower HKComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences - 9, 10.33Computer Network…
Computer vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Computer's grants concentrate

Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 55.6% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Computer sits between Codiak Biosciences, Inc. and Convenientpower HK Limited.

Computer's three-year grant acceleration

Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Computer's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Computer holds 9 patents at rank #28,391, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Computer

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,391 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Computer's primary technology class.

Computer's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 31% higher than 69% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 2015201620182019202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 22.2%
2016 1 11.1%
2018 1 11.1%
2019 1 11.1%
2023 1 11.1%
2024 2 22.2%
2025partial year 1 11.1%

Which technologies does Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences patent most?

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 55.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #28,468 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy OF Sciences against Codiak Biosciences, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 42.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.