Where does Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. ranks #45,801 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. hold?

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2024, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 46.1 out of 100 (top 22% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. focus on?

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s top technology area is F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids) with 5 patents, ranking #27 of 164 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s patents?

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s patents average 21.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Columbia ranks #45,801 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#45,801
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 22%
by Innovation Score (46.1/100): 21.4
avg claims per patent: +50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R45801 · US Corporation #45,801 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #45,801/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Collotype Services Pty
CPC-NARROW F03B · 4 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.1/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Collotype Services Pty Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Columbia’s 46.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (13%) Velocity 20.0 pts (43%) Breadth 7.1 pts (15%) Claim depth 12.8 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Columbia Power · this assignee

46
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Columbia's Innovation Score is 46.1/100 (top 22% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Columbia?

Each dot is one of Columbia’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Columbia’s own 21.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Columbia vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Columbia's grants concentrate

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Columbia sits between Collotype Services Pty Ltd and Combi Corporation.

Columbia's three-year grant acceleration

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Collotype Service…

5
Colorlink Japan

5
Colorado Tripod

5
Columbia Phytotec…

5
Columbia Steel Ca…

5
Comar Investments

5
Combain Mobile AB

5
Combi

5
Columbia Power ◀

5

What this shows Columbia holds 5 patents at rank #45,906, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Columbia

By rank, the assignees closest to #45,906 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Columbia's primary technology class.

Columbia's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 22% higher than 78% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	20.0%
2017	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2024	2	40.0%

Which technologies does Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. patent most?

F03B - Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids 5

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 5

F05B - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Wind, Spring, Weight, Inertia OR Like Motors, TO Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids Covered BY Subclasses F03b, F03d AND F03g 4

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F03B
Ranked #45,801 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. against Collotype Services Pty Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.