PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2016–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F03B (MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
5
Total patents granted
4
CPC technology areas
21.4
Avg claims per patent
+50%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Columbia holds 5 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #45,906 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#45,906
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 22%
by Innovation Score (46.1/100)
21.4
avg claims per patent
+50%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2016 and 2024, placing Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. at rank #45,906 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in F03B (MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS). As a US Corporation, Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Columbia sits between Collotype Services Pty Ltd (5 patents, rank #45,902) and Combi Corporation (5 patents, rank #45,910) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 46.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +50% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s 21.4 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Columbia's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Columbia holds 5 patents at rank #45,906, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Columbia

By rank, the assignees closest to #45,906 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Columbia's primary technology class.

Columbia's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 22% higher than 78% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 2016201720232024 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 20.0%
2017 1 20.0%
2023 1 20.0%
2024 2 40.0%

Which technologies does Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Specialized
Claim Depth Complex
Velocity Accelerating

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#45,906

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

46.1 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. hold?
Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. holds 5 US granted patents filed between 2016 and 2024, spanning 4 technology areas.
What is Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s Innovation Score?
Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 46.1 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. focus on?
Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s top technology area is F03B (MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS) with 5 patents. The company has filed patents in 4 CPC subclasses total.
Is Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s recent filing velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s patents?
Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.'s patents average 21.4 claims each. This indicates complex, broadly scoped patents that are harder for competitors to design around.
How is the Columbia Power Technologies, Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Columbia's 5 grants land it in the top 22% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Columbia ranks #45,906 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in F03B - see who else leads that technology area. F03B leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.