Codex Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Codex ranks #18,494 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #18,494
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 13%
- by Innovation Score (50.3/100)
- 15.1
- avg claims per patent
- +40%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R18494 · US Corporation #18,494 · 15 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
- MID-PACK #18,494/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cidara Therapeutics
- CPC-FOCUS G08B · 11 areas
- INNOV-PAR 50.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-UP +40% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Codex’s 50.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Codex
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Codex · this assignee
Codex · this assignee
50 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Codex's Innovation Score is 50.3/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Codex?
Each dot is one of Codex’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Codex’s own 15.1 claims/patent is at or below the 16.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Codex's grants concentrate
Codex Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 53.3% of grants classified under G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Codex sits between Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. and Compellent Technologies.
Codex's three-year grant acceleration
Codex Corporation shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Codex's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cidara Therapeuti…
Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.
15 patents
- Civic
Civic Technologies, Inc.
15 patents
- Civitas Therapeut…
Civitas Therapeutics, Inc.
15 patents
- Clearplay
ClearPlay, Inc.
15 patents
- Cognipower
CogniPower, LLC
15 patents
- Coil Solutions
Coil Solutions Inc.
15 patents
- Comalander Fabric…
Comalander Fabrication and Services, LLC
15 patents
- Compellent
Compellent Technologies
15 patents
- Codex ◀
Codex Corporation
15 patents
What this shows Codex holds 15 patents at rank #18,500, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Codex
By rank, the assignees closest to #18,500 in granted patent volume.
- Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. #18,496 · 15 patents
- Civic Technologies, Inc. #18,497 · 15 patents
- Civitas Therapeutics, Inc. #18,498 · 15 patents
- ClearPlay, Inc. #18,499 · 15 patents
- CogniPower, LLC #18,501 · 15 patents
- Coil Solutions Inc. #18,502 · 15 patents
- Comalander Fabrication and Services, LLC #18,503 · 15 patents
- Compellent Technologies #18,504 · 15 patents
Leaders in G08B (Signalling OR Calling Systems)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Codex's primary technology class.
Codex's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 13.3% |
| 2016 | 3 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2023 | 3 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 3 | 20.0% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Codex Corporation patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Codex Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Codex Corporation's lead technology class is G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems), 53.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G08B
- Ranked #18,494 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Codex Corporation against Cidara Therapeutics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 50.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.