Where does CM Visual Technology Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), CM Visual Technology Corporation ranks #34,790 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does CM Visual Technology Corporation hold?

CM Visual Technology Corporation holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is CM Visual Technology Corporation's Innovation Score?

CM Visual Technology Corporation has an Innovation Score of 24.0 out of 100 (13th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does CM Visual Technology Corporation focus on?

CM Visual Technology Corporation's top technology area is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus) with 7 patents, ranking #1,362 of 4,891 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is CM Visual Technology Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

CM Visual Technology Corporation's recent grant velocity is +200% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for CM Visual Technology Corporation's patents?

CM Visual Technology Corporation's patents average 14.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the CM Visual Technology Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

CM Visual Technology Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, CM ranks #34,790 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.

#34,790
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 13th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.0/100): 14.1
avg claims per patent: +200%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R34790 · Foreign Corporation #34,790 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #34,790/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cleverciti Systems
CPC-NARROW G02B · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +200% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cleverciti Systems GMBH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How CM’s 24.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (30%) Velocity 2.2 pts (9%) Breadth 6.1 pts (25%) Claim depth 8.5 pts (35%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
CM Visual Technology · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows CM's Innovation Score is 24.0/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for CM?

Each dot is one of CM’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). CM’s own 14.1 claims/patent is at or below the 17.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

CM vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where CM's grants concentrate

CM Visual Technology Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). By volume, CM sits between Cleverciti Systems GMBH and Co-tech Development Corp..

CM's three-year grant acceleration

CM Visual Technology Corporation shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Cleverciti Systems

7
Click Sales

7
Clio

7
Cloudinary

7
Cmblu Energy

7
CMC Biologics A/S

7
Cnpc Chuanqing Dr…

7
-tech Development

7
CM Visual Technol… ◀

7

What this shows CM holds 7 patents at rank #34,698, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near CM

By rank, the assignees closest to #34,698 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in CM's primary technology class.

CM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

CM Visual Technology Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	14.3%
2020	1	14.3%
2021	1	14.3%
2022	1	14.3%
2025partial year	3	42.9%

Which technologies does CM Visual Technology Corporation patent most?

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 7

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 1

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

CM Visual Technology Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

CM Visual Technology Corporation's lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
Ranked #34,790 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare CM Visual Technology Corporation against Cleverciti Systems GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.