PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Climax Technology Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Climax ranks #15,910 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 21 technology areas.

#15,910
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 33%
by Innovation Score (41.6/100)
14.3
avg claims per patent
+29%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15910 · Foreign Corporation #15,910 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
  • MID-PACK #15,910/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Chapman/Leonard…
  • CPC-FOCUS G08B · 21 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 41.6/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 14.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-UP +29% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Chapman/Leonard Studio Equipment, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Climax’s 41.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Climax

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Climax's Innovation Score is 41.6/100 (top 33% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Climax?

Each dot is one of Climax’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Climax’s own 14.3 claims/patent is at or below the 16.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Climax vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 17.917.91818.1 51015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Chapman/Leonard Studio Equipment, Inc. - 18, 12.17Chapman/Leonard S…Cheer Pack North America - 18, 6.17Cheer Pack North…China Medical University Hospital - 18, 10.44China Medical Uni…Ciphercloud, Inc. - 18, 19.5CiphercloudClinc, Inc. - 18, 16.89ClincClover Health - 18, 19.39Clover HealthCohda Wireless Pty Ltd. - 18, 24.94Cohda Wireless PtyCombined Conditional Access Development And Support, LLC - 18, 22.94Combined Conditio…Climax Technology Co., Ltd. - 18, 14.33Climax Technology
Climax vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Climax's grants concentrate

Climax Technology Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 21 CPC subclasses with 44.4% of grants classified under G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Climax sits between Chapman/Leonard Studio Equipment, Inc. and Combined Conditional Access Development And Support, LLC.

Climax's three-year grant acceleration

Climax Technology Co., Ltd. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Climax's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Climax holds 18 patents at rank #15,926, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Climax

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,926 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G08B (Signalling OR Calling Systems)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Climax's primary technology class.

Climax's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 33% higher than 67% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 2016201720182019202020212022202320242025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Climax Technology Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 5.6%
2017 2 11.1%
2018 3 16.7%
2019 1 5.6%
2020 1 5.6%
2021 3 16.7%
2022 1 5.6%
2023 3 16.7%
2024 1 5.6%
2025partial year 2 11.1%

Which technologies does Climax Technology Co., Ltd. patent most?

Top 15 of 21 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Climax Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Climax Technology Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems), 44.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G08B
  • Ranked #15,910 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Climax Technology Co., Ltd. against Chapman/Leonard Studio Equipment, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 41.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.