Where does ClearWater Holdings Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ClearWater Holdings Ltd. ranks #24,109 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does ClearWater Holdings Ltd. hold?

ClearWater Holdings Ltd. holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2024, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is ClearWater Holdings Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

ClearWater Holdings Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 35.4 out of 100 (top 50% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does ClearWater Holdings Ltd. focus on?

ClearWater Holdings Ltd.'s top technology area is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines) with 8 patents, ranking #321 of 1,724 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is ClearWater Holdings Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

ClearWater Holdings Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +167% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for ClearWater Holdings Ltd.'s patents?

ClearWater Holdings Ltd.'s patents average 21.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the ClearWater Holdings Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

ClearWater Holdings Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Clearwater ranks #24,109 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 4 technology areas.

#24,109
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 50%
by Innovation Score (35.4/100): 21.7
avg claims per patent: +167%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R24109 · US Corporation #24,109 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #24,109/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Circassia
CPC-NARROW H02K · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 35.4/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +167% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Circassia Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Clearwater’s 35.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (24%) Velocity 6.7 pts (19%) Breadth 7.1 pts (20%) Claim depth 13.0 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
ClearWater Holdings · this assignee

35
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Clearwater's Innovation Score is 35.4/100 (top 50% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clearwater?

Each dot is one of Clearwater’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clearwater’s own 21.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Clearwater vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Clearwater's grants concentrate

ClearWater Holdings Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 72.7% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Clearwater sits between Circassia Limited and Clockwork Systems, Inc..

Clearwater's three-year grant acceleration

ClearWater Holdings Ltd. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Circassia

11
Cirrus Design

11
Civilized Cycles…

11
Cleaning Systems

11
Clever Devices

11
Click Diagnostics

11
Click Holdings

11
Clockwork Systems

11
Clearwater Holdin… ◀

11

What this shows ClearWater holds 11 patents at rank #24,139, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near ClearWater

By rank, the assignees closest to #24,139 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in ClearWater's primary technology class.

Clearwater's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 Top 50% higher than 50% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

ClearWater Holdings Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	9.1%
2019	2	18.2%
2020	1	9.1%
2021	2	18.2%
2022	2	18.2%
2023	1	9.1%
2024	2	18.2%

Which technologies does ClearWater Holdings Ltd. patent most?

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 8

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 4

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 3

H01G - CAPACITORS; Capacitors, Rectifiers, Detectors, Switching Devices, Light-sensitive OR Temperature-sensitive Devices OF THE Electrolytic Type 2

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

ClearWater Holdings Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

ClearWater Holdings Ltd.'s lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 72.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
Ranked #24,109 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare ClearWater Holdings Ltd. against Circassia Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 35.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.