Where does Clearag, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Clearag, Inc. ranks #19,609 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Clearag, Inc. hold?

Clearag, Inc. holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2019, spanning 21 technology areas.

What is Clearag, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Clearag, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 40.3 out of 100 (top 36% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Clearag, Inc. focus on?

Clearag, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 9 patents, ranking #3,920 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 21 CPC subclasses total.

Is Clearag, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Clearag, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Clearag, Inc.'s patents?

Clearag, Inc.'s patents average 24.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Clearag, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Clearag, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Clearag ranks #19,609 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 21 technology areas.

#19,609
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 36%
by Innovation Score (40.3/100): 24.6
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19609 · US Corporation #19,609 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #19,609/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH City Labs
CPC-FOCUS G06F · 21 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 24.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: City Labs, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Clearag’s 40.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (23%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 16.2 pts (40%) Claim depth 14.7 pts (36%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Clearag · this assignee

40
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Clearag's Innovation Score is 40.3/100 (top 36% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clearag?

Each dot is one of Clearag’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clearag’s own 24.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Clearag vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Clearag's grants concentrate

Clearag, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 21 CPC subclasses with 64.3% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). By volume, Clearag sits between City Labs, Inc. and Comba Telecom Technology (GUANGZHOU) Ltd..

City Labs

14
CJ Healthcare

14
Claas Industriete…

14
Clarke Mosquito C…

14
Coflow JET

14
Collateral Opport…

14
Comba Telecom Sys…

14
Comba Telecom Tec…

14
Clearag ◀

14

What this shows Clearag holds 14 patents at rank #19,582, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Clearag

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,582 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Clearag's primary technology class.

Clearag's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 36% higher than 64% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Clearag, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	7	50.0%
2019	7	50.0%

Which technologies does Clearag, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 9

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 8

A01G - HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering 6

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 6

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 4

A01B - Soil Working IN Agriculture OR FORESTRY; Parts, Details, OR Accessories OF Agricultural Machines OR Implements, IN General 4

G01W - Meteorology 4

A01C - PLANTING; SOWING; Fertilising 3

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

A01D - HARVESTING; Mowing 2

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

A01F - Processing OF Harvested PRODUCE; HAY OR Straw PRESSES; Devices FOR Storing Agricultural OR Horticultural Produce 2

F24F - AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR Currents FOR Screening 2

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 1

Top 15 of 21 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Clearag, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Clearag, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 64.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #19,609 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Clearag, Inc. against City Labs, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.