Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 57 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Citicorp ranks #5,922 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 57 patents across 15 technology areas.
- #5,922
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 14%
- by Innovation Score (49.6/100)
- 19.9
- avg claims per patent
- -20%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R5922 · US Corporation #5,922 · 57 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 57 grants
- UPPER-Q #5,922/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Auto-Kabel Management
- CPC-FOCUS G06Q · 15 areas
- INNOV-PAR 49.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -20% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Auto-Kabel Management GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Citicorp’s 49.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Citicorp
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Azur Space Solar Power · near
Azur Space Solar Power · near
50 score
- Board OF Regents OF… · near
Board OF Regents OF… · near
50 score
- Citicorp Credit… · this assignee
Citicorp Credit… · this assignee
50 score
- Idemia Identity &… · near
Idemia Identity &… · near
50 score
- Utopus Insights · near
Utopus Insights · near
50 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Citicorp's Innovation Score is 49.6/100 (top 14% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Citicorp?
Each dot is one of Citicorp’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Citicorp’s own 19.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Citicorp's grants concentrate
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA) is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (10 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, Citicorp sits between Auto-Kabel Management GmbH and Ceva Sante Animale.
Citicorp's three-year grant acceleration
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA) shows 18 grants in 2022–2024 against only 12 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Citicorp's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Auto-kabel Manage…
Auto-Kabel Management GmbH
57 patents
- Automatic Bar Con…
Automatic Bar Controls, Inc.
57 patents
- BOE Mled Technolo…
BOE Mled Technology Co., Ltd.
57 patents
- Black Hills IP Ho…
Black Hills IP Holdings, LLC
57 patents
- Curver Luxembourg…
Curver Luxembourg Sarl
57 patents
- Carbon Technology…
Carbon Technology Holdings, LLC
57 patents
- Cardio Flow
Cardio Flow, Inc.
57 patents
- Ceva Sante Animale
Ceva Sante Animale
57 patents
- Citicorp Credit S… ◀
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
57 patents
What this shows Citicorp holds 57 patents at rank #5,918, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Citicorp
By rank, the assignees closest to #5,918 in granted patent volume.
- Auto-Kabel Management GmbH #5,914 · 57 patents
- Automatic Bar Controls, Inc. #5,915 · 57 patents
- BOE Mled Technology Co., Ltd. #5,916 · 57 patents
- Black Hills IP Holdings, LLC #5,917 · 57 patents
- Curver Luxembourg Sarl #5,919 · 57 patents
- Carbon Technology Holdings, LLC #5,920 · 57 patents
- Cardio Flow, Inc. #5,921 · 57 patents
- Ceva Sante Animale #5,922 · 57 patents
Leaders in G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Citicorp's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 6,621 in class
- Google LLC 3,295 in class
- Capital ONE Services, LLC 3,005 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 2,993 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 2,990 in class
- Facebook, Inc. 1,919 in class
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 1,697 in class
- Mastercard International Incorporated 1,644 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Citicorp, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…), Citicorp ranks #367 of 6,520 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (19.9 here).
Citicorp's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 14% higher than 86% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 5.3% |
| 2016 | 4 | 7.0% |
| 2017 | 7 | 12.3% |
| 2018 | 10 | 17.5% |
| 2019 | 6 | 10.5% |
| 2020 | 4 | 7.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 3.5% |
| 2022 | 8 | 14.0% |
| 2023 | 5 | 8.8% |
| 2024 | 5 | 8.8% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 5.3% |
Which technologies does Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA) patent most?
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)'s lead technology class is G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06Q
- Ranked #5,922 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA) against Auto-Kabel Management GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 49.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.