Cirrex Systems, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cirrex ranks #26,006 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #26,006
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 17th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.2/100)
- 11.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R26006 · US Corporation #26,006 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #26,006/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Chuo University
- CPC-NARROW G02B · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.2/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Chuo University (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cirrex’s 25.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cirrex
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cirrex Systems · this assignee 25
Cirrex Systems · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cirrex's Innovation Score is 25.2/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cirrex?
Each dot is one of Cirrex’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cirrex’s own 11.5 claims/patent is at or below the 14.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Cirrex's grants concentrate
Cirrex Systems, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Cirrex sits between Chuo University and Cloud Byte LLC..
Who files at Cirrex's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Chuo University
Chuo University
10 patents
- Cicaboom S r L
Cicaboom S.r.L
10 patents
- Cinemo
Cinemo GMBH
10 patents
- Circle Internet F…
Circle Internet Financial, LLC
10 patents
- Cirrus Data Solut…
Cirrus Data Solutions Inc.
10 patents
- Claber S P A
Claber S.P.A.
10 patents
- Clariant Catalyst…
Clariant Catalysts (JAPAN) K.K.
10 patents
- Cloud Byte
Cloud Byte LLC.
10 patents
- Cirrex Systems ◀
Cirrex Systems, LLC
10 patents
What this shows Cirrex holds 10 patents at rank #25,973, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cirrex
By rank, the assignees closest to #25,973 in granted patent volume.
- Chuo University #25,969 · 10 patents
- Cicaboom S.r.L #25,970 · 10 patents
- Cinemo GMBH #25,971 · 10 patents
- Circle Internet Financial, LLC #25,972 · 10 patents
- Cirrus Data Solutions Inc. #25,974 · 10 patents
- Claber S.P.A. #25,975 · 10 patents
- Clariant Catalysts (JAPAN) K.K. #25,976 · 10 patents
- Cloud Byte LLC. #25,977 · 10 patents
Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cirrex's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,608 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 2,525 in class
- Fujifilm Corporation 2,173 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 1,899 in class
- Olympus Corporation 1,893 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,572 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,367 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 1,332 in class
Cirrex's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 8 | 80.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does Cirrex Systems, LLC patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cirrex Systems, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cirrex Systems, LLC's lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
- Ranked #26,006 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cirrex Systems, LLC against Chuo University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.