Cirba IP Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cirba ranks #45,686 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #45,686
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 20th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.2/100)
- 32.6
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R45686 · Foreign Corporation #45,686 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #45,686/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Chun Lam Group…
- CPC-NARROW H04L · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.2/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 32.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Chun Lam Group (International) Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cirba’s 26.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cirba
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cirba IP · this assignee 26
Cirba IP · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cirba's Innovation Score is 26.2/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cirba?
Each dot is one of Cirba’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cirba’s own 32.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cirba's grants concentrate
Cirba IP Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Cirba sits between Chun Lam Group (International) Limited and Cisma Solutions ApS.
Who files at Cirba's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Chun Lam Group (I…
Chun Lam Group (International) Limited
5 patents
- Cinarra Systems
Cinarra Systems, Inc.
5 patents
- Cintas
Cintas Corporation
5 patents
- Cionic
Cionic, Inc.
5 patents
- Circ
Circ, LLC
5 patents
- Circle Computer R…
Circle Computer Resources, Inc.
5 patents
- Circle Dynamics
Circle Dynamics, Inc.
5 patents
- Cisma Solutions A…
Cisma Solutions ApS
5 patents
- Cirba IP ◀
Cirba IP Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Cirba holds 5 patents at rank #45,850, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cirba
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,850 in granted patent volume.
- Chun Lam Group (International) Limited #45,846 · 5 patents
- Cinarra Systems, Inc. #45,847 · 5 patents
- Cintas Corporation #45,848 · 5 patents
- Cionic, Inc. #45,849 · 5 patents
- Circ, LLC #45,851 · 5 patents
- Circle Computer Resources, Inc. #45,852 · 5 patents
- Circle Dynamics, Inc. #45,853 · 5 patents
- Cisma Solutions ApS #45,854 · 5 patents
Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cirba's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 15,969 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 13,594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 11,697 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 10,543 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 9,062 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 8,543 in class
- Cisco Technology, Inc. 7,502 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 7,301 in class
Cirba's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Cirba IP Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cirba IP Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cirba IP Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
- Ranked #45,686 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cirba IP Inc. against Chun Lam Group (International) Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.