USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Chris Cam Industry, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Chris ranks #20,922 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 0 technology areas.

#20,922
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
5th percentile
by Innovation Score (19.1/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
+233%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20922 · Foreign Corporation #20,922 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
  • MID-PACK #20,922/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Chelsio Communications
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 19.1/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +233% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Chelsio Communications, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Chris’s 19.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Chris

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Chris's Innovation Score is 19.1/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Chris?

Each dot is one of Chris’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Chris’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 12.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Chris vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 12.912.91313.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Chelsio Communications, Inc. - 13, 18.23Chelsio Communica…Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc. - 13, 10.54Chembio Diagnosti…Cheveux Corporation - 13, 1CheveuxChongqing University of Arts and Sciences - 13, 9.38Chongqing Univers…Chromalox, Inc. - 13, 20ChromaloxCircuit Seed, LLC - 13, 12.69Circuit SeedCircuit Therapeutics, Inc. - 13, 35.23Circuit Therapeut…Cixi City Liyuan Auto Parts Co., Ltd - 13, 16.31Cixi City Liyuan…Chris Cam Industry, Inc. - 13, 1Chris Cam Industry
Chris vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Chris's grants concentrate

Chris Cam Industry, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Chris sits between Chelsio Communications, Inc. and Cixi City Liyuan Auto Parts Co., Ltd.

Chris's three-year grant acceleration

Chris Cam Industry, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Chris's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Chris holds 13 patents at rank #20,948, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Chris

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,948 in granted patent volume.

Chris's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 201720192020202220232024 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Chris Cam Industry, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 1 7.7%
2019 2 15.4%
2020 3 23.1%
2022 2 15.4%
2023 1 7.7%
2024 4 30.8%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Chris Cam Industry, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #20,922 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Chris Cam Industry, Inc. against Chelsio Communications, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 19.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.