C.H.&I. Technologies, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 17 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, C.h.&i. ranks #24,096 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 17 technology areas.
- #24,096
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 26th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.2/100)
- 8.4
- avg claims per patent
- -78%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24096 · US Corporation #24,096 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,096/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Brownmed
- CPC-FOCUS B65D · 17 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.2/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -78% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Brownmed, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How C.h.&i.’s 28.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around C.h.&i.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- C H &I · this assignee 28
C H &I · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows C.h.&i.'s Innovation Score is 28.2/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for C.h.&i.?
Each dot is one of C.h.&i.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). C.h.&i.’s own 8.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where C.h.&i.'s grants concentrate
C.H.&I. Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 17 CPC subclasses with 54.5% of grants classified under B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, C.h.&i. sits between Brownmed, Inc. and Caire Inc..
Who files at CH&I's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Brownmed
Brownmed, Inc.
11 patents
- Buckhorn
Buckhorn Inc.
11 patents
- Bytemark
Bytemark, Inc.
11 patents
- C-media
C-media Electronics Inc.
11 patents
- Cable FIX
Cable FIX LLC
11 patents
- Cadbury UK
Cadbury UK Limited
11 patents
- Caeleste Cvba
Caeleste Cvba
11 patents
- Caire
Caire Inc.
11 patents
- C H &I ◀
C.H.&I. Technologies, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows C.H.&I. holds 11 patents at rank #24,040, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near CH&I
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,040 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CH&I's primary technology class.
- The Procter & Gamble Company 471 in class
- Graphic Packaging International, LLC 329 in class
- Sonoco Development, Inc. 252 in class
- Altria Client Services LLC 165 in class
- S. C. Johnson & SON, Inc. 162 in class
- Nestec S.A. 150 in class
- Yoshino Kogyosho Co., Ltd. 150 in class
- Toyo Seikan Co., Ltd. 141 in class
C.h.&i.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2017 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2019 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 18.2% |
Which technologies does C.H.&I. Technologies, Inc. patent most?
Top 15 of 17 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
C.H.&I. Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- C.H.&I. Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F), 54.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65D
- Ranked #24,096 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare C.H.&I. Technologies, Inc. against Brownmed, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.