PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 56 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Check ranks #6,011 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 56 patents across 7 technology areas.

#6,011
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 41%
by Innovation Score (38.5/100)
16.3
avg claims per patent
-19%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R6011 · Foreign Corporation #6,011 · 56 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 56 grants
  • UPPER-Q #6,011/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Caribou Biosciences
  • CPC-NARROW H04L · 7 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 38.5/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 16.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DOWN -19% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Caribou Biosciences, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Check’s 38.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Check

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Check's Innovation Score is 38.5/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Check?

Each dot is one of Check’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Check’s own 16.3 claims/patent is at or below the 17.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Check vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 55.956.056.05656.056.056.1 01020304050 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent CSL Behring AG - 56, 18.54CSL BehringCyberlink Corp. - 56, 19.45CyberlinkCaribou Biosciences, Inc. - 56, 17.3Caribou Bioscienc…CertusView Technologies, LLC - 56, 39CertusviewDK Crown Holdings Inc. - 56, 18.62DK Crown HoldingsDongguan Powerme Plastic MFG. Co., Ltd. - 56, 1.21Dongguan Powerme…DaVinci II CSJ, LLC - 56, 1.88Davinci II CSJDongguan University of Technology - 56, 9.88Dongguan Universi…Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. - 56, 16.25Check Point Softw…
Check vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Check's grants concentrate

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 76.8% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (8 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Check sits between CSL Behring AG and Dongguan University of Technology.

Check's three-year grant acceleration

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. shows 13 grants in 2022–2024 against only 16 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Check's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Check holds 56 patents at rank #6,014, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Check

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,014 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Check's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Check, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information), Check ranks #733 of 8,956 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (38 here).

Teknor Apex Company 38 Woodway USA, Inc. 38 J.W. Speaker Corporation 38 Livio, Inc. 38

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.3 here).

Luxembourg Institute of Science & Technology (LIST) 16.3 avg Bausch & Lomb Incorporated 16.3 avg ABB AG 16.3 avg Neuravi Limited 16.3 avg

Check's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 7
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 6 10.7%
2016 2 3.6%
2017 8 14.3%
2018 4 7.1%
2019 7 12.5%
2020 6 10.7%
2021 3 5.4%
2022 5 8.9%
2023 5 8.9%
2024 3 5.4%
2025partial year 7 12.5%

Which technologies does Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. patent most?

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 76.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
  • Ranked #6,011 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. against CSL Behring AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 38.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.