Where does ChargePoint Technology Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ChargePoint Technology Limited ranks #31,178 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does ChargePoint Technology Limited hold?

ChargePoint Technology Limited holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2021, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is ChargePoint Technology Limited's Innovation Score?

ChargePoint Technology Limited has an Innovation Score of 26.3 out of 100 (20th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does ChargePoint Technology Limited focus on?

ChargePoint Technology Limited's top technology area is F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating) with 5 patents, ranking #429 of 1,836 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is ChargePoint Technology Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

ChargePoint Technology Limited's recent grant velocity is -40% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for ChargePoint Technology Limited's patents?

ChargePoint Technology Limited's patents average 18.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the ChargePoint Technology Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

ChargePoint Technology Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Chargepoint ranks #31,178 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 5 technology areas.

#31,178
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 20th percentile
by Innovation Score (26.3/100): 18.0
avg claims per patent: -40%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R31178 · Foreign Corporation #31,178 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #31,178/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cequint
CPC-NARROW F16K · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 26.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -40% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cequint, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Chargepoint’s 26.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (29%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.9 pts (30%) Claim depth 10.8 pts (41%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
ChargePoint Technology · this assignee

26
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Chargepoint's Innovation Score is 26.3/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Chargepoint?

Each dot is one of Chargepoint’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Chargepoint’s own 18.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Chargepoint vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Chargepoint's grants concentrate

ChargePoint Technology Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Chargepoint sits between Cequint, Inc. and Chemeon Surface Technology, LLC.

Cequint

8
Ceragon Networks

8
Cerus Endovascular

8
Chaos Software

8
Charm Industrial

8
Cheers Health

8
Chemgenes

8
Chemeon Surface T…

8
Chargepoint Techn… ◀

8

What this shows ChargePoint holds 8 patents at rank #31,271, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near ChargePoint

By rank, the assignees closest to #31,271 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16K (Valves)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in ChargePoint's primary technology class.

Chargepoint's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

ChargePoint Technology Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	12.5%
2017	3	37.5%
2019	1	12.5%
2020	2	25.0%
2021	1	12.5%

Which technologies does ChargePoint Technology Limited patent most?

F16K - VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating 5

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 3

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 1

B01L - Chemical OR Physical Laboratory Apparatus FOR General USE 1

F16L - PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

ChargePoint Technology Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

ChargePoint Technology Limited's lead technology class is F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16K
Ranked #31,178 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare ChargePoint Technology Limited against Cequint, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 26.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.