Where does Certona Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Certona Corporation ranks #28,380 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Certona Corporation hold?

Certona Corporation holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Certona Corporation's Innovation Score?

Certona Corporation has an Innovation Score of 27.4 out of 100 (24th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Certona Corporation focus on?

Certona Corporation's top technology area is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models) with 7 patents, ranking #1,082 of 4,479 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Certona Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Certona Corporation's recent grant velocity is -71% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Certona Corporation's patents?

Certona Corporation's patents average 20.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Certona Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Certona Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Certona ranks #28,380 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.

#28,380
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 24th percentile
by Innovation Score (27.4/100): 20.6
avg claims per patent: -71%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28380 · US Corporation #28,380 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #28,380/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cellutech AB
CPC-NARROW G06N · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 27.4/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 20.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -71% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cellutech AB (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Certona’s 27.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (29%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.1 pts (26%) Claim depth 12.3 pts (45%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Certona · this assignee

27
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Certona's Innovation Score is 27.4/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Certona?

Each dot is one of Certona’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Certona’s own 20.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Certona vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Certona's grants concentrate

Certona Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 77.8% of grants classified under G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Certona sits between Cellutech AB and Charles & Colvard, Ltd..

Cellutech AB

9
Center Vue S p A

9
Central Adelaide…

9
Centro de Investi…

9
Changsha Sinocare

9
Chapman University

9
Charge Fusion

9
Charles & Colvard

9
Certona ◀

9

What this shows Certona holds 9 patents at rank #28,448, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Certona

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,448 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Certona's primary technology class.

Certona's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Certona Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	22.2%
2016	1	11.1%
2017	1	11.1%
2018	1	11.1%
2019	2	22.2%
2020	2	22.2%

Which technologies does Certona Corporation patent most?

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 7

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 7

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 6

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Certona Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Certona Corporation's lead technology class is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models), 77.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06N
Ranked #28,380 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Certona Corporation against Cellutech AB, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 27.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.