Cequent Consumer Products, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16G (Belts, Cables, OR Ropes, Predominantly Used FOR Driving PURPOSES; CHAINS; Fittings Predominantly Used Therefor).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cequent ranks #12,862 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #12,862
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 14th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.3/100)
- 6.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R12862 · US Corporation #12,862 · 23 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
- MID-PACK #12,862/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cadwell Laboratories
- CPC-NARROW F16G · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.3/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cadwell Laboratories, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cequent’s 24.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cequent
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cequent Consumer… · this assignee 24
Cequent Consumer… · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cequent's Innovation Score is 24.3/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cequent?
Each dot is one of Cequent’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cequent’s own 6.7 claims/patent is at or below the 18.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Cequent's grants concentrate
Cequent Consumer Products, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 8.7% of grants classified under F16G (Belts, Cables, OR Ropes, Predominantly Used FOR Driving PURPOSES; CHAINS; Fittings Predominantly Used Therefor). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (11 grants) versus a trough of 5 in 2017. By volume, Cequent sits between Ctera Networks Ltd. and Clarapath, Inc..
Who files at Cequent's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ctera Networks
Ctera Networks Ltd.
23 patents
- Cadwell Laborator…
Cadwell Laboratories, Inc.
23 patents
- Cagent Vascular
Cagent Vascular, Inc.
23 patents
- Cardica
Cardica, Inc.
23 patents
- Chemische Fabrik…
Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG
23 patents
- Cheng Shin Rubber…
Cheng Shin Rubber (Xiamen) Ind. Ltd.
23 patents
- Chromera
Chromera, Inc.
23 patents
- Clarapath
Clarapath, Inc.
23 patents
- Cequent Consumer… ◀
Cequent Consumer Products, Inc.
23 patents
What this shows Cequent holds 23 patents at rank #12,872, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cequent
By rank, the assignees closest to #12,872 in granted patent volume.
- Ctera Networks Ltd. #12,868 · 23 patents
- Cadwell Laboratories, Inc. #12,869 · 23 patents
- Cagent Vascular, Inc. #12,870 · 23 patents
- Cardica, Inc. #12,871 · 23 patents
- Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG #12,873 · 23 patents
- Cheng Shin Rubber (Xiamen) Ind. Ltd. #12,874 · 23 patents
- Chromera, Inc. #12,875 · 23 patents
- Clarapath, Inc. #12,876 · 23 patents
Leaders in F16G (Belts)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cequent's primary technology class.
Cequent's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 11 | 47.8% |
| 2016 | 7 | 30.4% |
| 2017 | 5 | 21.7% |
Which technologies does Cequent Consumer Products, Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cequent Consumer Products, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cequent Consumer Products, Inc.'s lead technology class is F16G (Belts, Cables, OR Ropes, Predominantly Used FOR Driving PURPOSES; CHAINS; Fittings Predominantly Used Therefor), 8.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16G
- Ranked #12,862 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cequent Consumer Products, Inc. against Ctera Networks Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.