Overall rank by patents
#45,785
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, active 2016–2020. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS).
The verdict
Celtic holds 5 US patents across 6 technology areas, rank #45,785 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Celtic Machining Ltd. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2016 and 2020, placing Celtic Machining Ltd. at rank #45,785 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 6 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS). As a Foreign Corporation, Celtic Machining Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Celtic sits between Cellagenics B.v. (5 patents, rank #45,781) and Centercross Archery Llc (5 patents, rank #45,789) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 24.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a -33% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Celtic Machining Ltd.'s 16.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 6 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Celtic Machining Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
CellaGenics B.V.
5 patents
Cellfire LLC
5 patents
Celligence International LLC
5 patents
Celltaxis, LLC
5 patents
Cenergistic LLC
5 patents
Cengage Learning, Inc.
5 patents
Centauri, LLC
5 patents
CenterCross Archery LLC
5 patents
Celtic Machining Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows Celtic holds 5 patents at rank #45,785, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,785 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Celtic's primary technology class.
Celtic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 Top 85% higher than 15% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 40.0% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#45,785
Across all tracked assignees
24.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Celtic's 5 grants land it in the top 85% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.