USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Celine

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Celine ranks #15,890 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 0 technology areas.

#15,890
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
2nd percentile
by Innovation Score (12.4/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-71%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15890 · Foreign Corporation #15,890 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
  • MID-PACK #15,890/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cainiao Smart…
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 12.4/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -71% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cainiao Smart Logistics Holding Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Celine’s 12.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Celine

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Celine's Innovation Score is 12.4/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Celine?

Each dot is one of Celine’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Celine’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 16.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Celine vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 17.917.91818.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cainiao Smart Logistics Holding Limited - 18, 17.67Cainiao Smart Log…Carestream Dental Technology Topco Limited - 18, 16.06Carestream Dental…Cartiva, Inc. - 18, 16.5CartivaCeladon Systems, Inc. - 18, 12.78Celadon SystemsCentralesupelec - 18, 16CentralesupelecCentre DE Recherche Industrielle DU Quebec (CRIQ) - 18, 21.89Centre DE Recherc…Chirp Microsystems Inc. - 18, 22.83Chirp MicrosystemsChryso - 18, 14.61ChrysoCeline - 18, 1Celine
Celine vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Celine's grants concentrate

Celine is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Celine sits between Cainiao Smart Logistics Holding Limited and Chryso.

Celine's three-year grant acceleration

Celine shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Celine's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Celine holds 18 patents at rank #15,883, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Celine

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,883 in granted patent volume.

Celine's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

12 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 2015201620172018201920202022 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Celine patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 11.1%
2016 2 11.1%
2017 5 27.8%
2018 4 22.2%
2019 1 5.6%
2020 3 16.7%
2022 1 5.6%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Celine's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #15,890 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Celine against Cainiao Smart Logistics Holding Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 12.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.