Celeno Communications Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04B (Transmission).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Celeno ranks #28,362 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #28,362
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 33rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.0/100)
- 25.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28362 · Foreign Corporation #28,362 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #28,362/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cavagna Group S P A
- CPC-NARROW H04B · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.0/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 25.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cavagna Group S.P.A. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Celeno’s 30.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Celeno
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Celeno Communications · this assignee 30
Celeno Communications · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Celeno's Innovation Score is 30.0/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Celeno?
Each dot is one of Celeno’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Celeno’s own 25.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 19.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Celeno's grants concentrate
Celeno Communications Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 77.8% of grants classified under H04B (Transmission). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, Celeno sits between Cavagna Group S.P.A. and Cellutech AB.
Who files at Celeno's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cavagna Group S P…
Cavagna Group S.P.A.
9 patents
- Cedar Ridge Resea…
Cedar Ridge Research LLC
9 patents
- Celanese EVA Perf…
Celanese EVA Performance Polymers LLC
9 patents
- Celcuity
Celcuity Inc.
9 patents
- Cell Medica
Cell Medica, Inc.
9 patents
- Cellino Biotech
Cellino Biotech, Inc.
9 patents
- Cellsec
Cellsec, Inc.
9 patents
- Cellutech AB
Cellutech AB
9 patents
- Celeno Communicat… ◀
Celeno Communications Ltd.
9 patents
What this shows Celeno holds 9 patents at rank #28,440, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Celeno
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,440 in granted patent volume.
- Cavagna Group S.P.A. #28,436 · 9 patents
- Cedar Ridge Research LLC #28,437 · 9 patents
- Celanese EVA Performance Polymers LLC #28,438 · 9 patents
- Celcuity Inc. #28,439 · 9 patents
- Cell Medica, Inc. #28,441 · 9 patents
- Cellino Biotech, Inc. #28,442 · 9 patents
- Cellsec, Inc. #28,443 · 9 patents
- Cellutech AB #28,444 · 9 patents
Leaders in H04B (Transmission)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Celeno's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 6,670 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,632 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 3,654 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 3,555 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 3,146 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,286 in class
- Intel Corporation 1,705 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,475 in class
Celeno's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2016 | 5 | 55.6% |
| 2018 | 2 | 22.2% |
Which technologies does Celeno Communications Ltd. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Celeno Communications Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Celeno Communications Ltd.'s lead technology class is H04B (Transmission), 77.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04B
- Ranked #28,362 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Celeno Communications Ltd. against Cavagna Group S.P.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.