Where does Cavity Sliders Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cavity Sliders Limited ranks #45,509 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cavity Sliders Limited hold?

Cavity Sliders Limited holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2024, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Cavity Sliders Limited's Innovation Score?

Cavity Sliders Limited has an Innovation Score of 27.6 out of 100 (24th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Cavity Sliders Limited focus on?

Cavity Sliders Limited's top technology area is E05C (Bolts OR Fastening Devices FOR Wings, Specially FOR Doors OR Windows) with 2 patents, ranking #150 of 424 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Cavity Sliders Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Cavity Sliders Limited's recent grant velocity is +300% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Cavity Sliders Limited's patents?

Cavity Sliders Limited's patents average 12.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cavity Sliders Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Cavity Sliders Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E05C (Bolts OR Fastening Devices FOR Wings, Specially FOR Doors OR Windows).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cavity ranks #45,509 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#45,509
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 24th percentile
by Innovation Score (27.6/100): 12.8
avg claims per patent: +300%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R45509 · Foreign Corporation #45,509 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #45,509/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Catalent Pharma…
CPC-NARROW E05C · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 27.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +300% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cavity’s 27.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (22%) Velocity 6.7 pts (24%) Breadth 7.1 pts (26%) Claim depth 7.7 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cavity Sliders · this assignee

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Cavity's Innovation Score is 27.6/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cavity?

Each dot is one of Cavity’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cavity’s own 12.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cavity vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cavity's grants concentrate

Cavity Sliders Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under E05C (Bolts OR Fastening Devices FOR Wings, Specially FOR Doors OR Windows). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Cavity sits between Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC and CCI Holdings Inc..

Cavity's three-year grant acceleration

Cavity Sliders Limited shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Catalent Pharma S…

5
Catalyst Orthopae…

5
Caterva

5
Cava Healthcare

5
Cavius APS

5
Cayago TEC

5
CBC

5
CCI Holdings

5
Cavity Sliders ◀

5

What this shows Cavity holds 5 patents at rank #45,460, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cavity

By rank, the assignees closest to #45,460 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E05C (Bolts OR Fastening Devices FOR Wings)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cavity's primary technology class.

Cavity's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cavity Sliders Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	1	20.0%
2021	2	40.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2024	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Cavity Sliders Limited patent most?

E05C - Bolts OR Fastening Devices FOR Wings, Specially FOR Doors OR Windows 2

E05B - LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs 2

E06B - Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings, Vehicles, Fences OR Like Enclosures IN General, e.g. Doors, Windows, Blinds, Gates 1

E05Y - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses E05d AND E05f, Relating TO Construction Elements, Electric Control, Power Supply, Power Signal OR Transmission, User Interfaces, Mounting OR Coupling, Details, Accessories, Auxiliary Operations NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, Application Thereof 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cavity Sliders Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Cavity Sliders Limited's lead technology class is E05C (Bolts OR Fastening Devices FOR Wings, Specially FOR Doors OR Windows), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E05C
Ranked #45,509 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Cavity Sliders Limited against Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 27.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.