Cathedral Energy Services Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cathedral ranks #39,353 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #39,353
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 9th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.9/100)
- 15.0
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39353 · Foreign Corporation #39,353 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,353/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH CaseMed Engineering
- CPC-NARROW F16C · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: CaseMed Engineering, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cathedral’s 21.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cathedral
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cathedral Energy… · this assignee 22
Cathedral Energy… · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cathedral's Innovation Score is 21.9/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cathedral?
Each dot is one of Cathedral’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cathedral’s own 15.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Cathedral's grants concentrate
Cathedral Energy Services Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Cathedral sits between CaseMed Engineering, LLC and Celerity Technologies Inc..
Who files at Cathedral's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Casemed Engineeri…
CaseMed Engineering, LLC
6 patents
- Cassava Sciences
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
6 patents
- Caterpiller
Caterpiller Inc.
6 patents
- Cathay (Jinxiang)…
Cathay (Jinxiang). Biomaterial Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Catis Pacific Mfg
Catis Pacific Mfg. Corp. Ltd.
6 patents
- Cbros
Cbros Technologies, LLC
6 patents
- Cefaly Technology…
Cefaly Technology Sprl
6 patents
- Celerity
Celerity Technologies Inc.
6 patents
- Cathedral Energy… ◀
Cathedral Energy Services Ltd.
6 patents
What this shows Cathedral holds 6 patents at rank #39,519, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cathedral
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,519 in granted patent volume.
- CaseMed Engineering, LLC #39,515 · 6 patents
- Cassava Sciences, Inc. #39,516 · 6 patents
- Caterpiller Inc. #39,517 · 6 patents
- Cathay (Jinxiang). Biomaterial Co., Ltd. #39,518 · 6 patents
- Catis Pacific Mfg. Corp. Ltd. #39,520 · 6 patents
- Cbros Technologies, LLC #39,521 · 6 patents
- Cefaly Technology Sprl #39,522 · 6 patents
- Celerity Technologies Inc. #39,523 · 6 patents
Leaders in F16C (Shafts)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cathedral's primary technology class.
Cathedral's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Cathedral Energy Services Ltd. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cathedral Energy Services Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cathedral Energy Services Ltd.'s lead technology class is F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16C
- Ranked #39,353 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cathedral Energy Services Ltd. against CaseMed Engineering, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.