Catalyst Medium Four, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 24 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Catalyst ranks #12,382 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 24 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #12,382
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 10th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.5/100)
- 3.5
- avg claims per patent
- +67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R12382 · US Corporation #12,382 · 24 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 24 grants
- UPPER-Q #12,382/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cal Poly
- CPC-NARROW A45C · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.5/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cal Poly Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Catalyst’s 22.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Catalyst
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Catalyst Medium Four · this assignee 22
Catalyst Medium Four · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Catalyst's Innovation Score is 22.5/100 (10th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Catalyst?
Each dot is one of Catalyst’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Catalyst’s own 3.5 claims/patent is at or below the 13.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Catalyst's grants concentrate
Catalyst Medium Four, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 16.7% of grants classified under A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (10 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Catalyst sits between Crrc Tangshan Co., Ltd. and Comcast Cable Holdings, LLC.
Catalyst's three-year grant acceleration
Catalyst Medium Four, Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 15 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Catalyst's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Crrc Tangshan
Crrc Tangshan Co., Ltd.
24 patents
- Cyngn
Cyngn, Inc.
24 patents
- Cal Poly
Cal Poly Corporation
24 patents
- Cassidian SAS
Cassidian SAS
24 patents
- Cerion
Cerion, LLC
24 patents
- Changzhou AAC Ray…
Changzhou AAC Raytech Optronics Co., Ltd.
24 patents
- Classic Auto Air…
Classic Auto Air Manufacturing LP
24 patents
- Comcast Cable Hol…
Comcast Cable Holdings, LLC
24 patents
- Catalyst Medium F… ◀
Catalyst Medium Four, Inc.
24 patents
What this shows Catalyst holds 24 patents at rank #12,390, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Catalyst
By rank, the assignees closest to #12,390 in granted patent volume.
- Crrc Tangshan Co., Ltd. #12,386 · 24 patents
- Cyngn, Inc. #12,387 · 24 patents
- Cal Poly Corporation #12,388 · 24 patents
- Cassidian SAS #12,389 · 24 patents
- Cerion, LLC #12,391 · 24 patents
- Changzhou AAC Raytech Optronics Co., Ltd. #12,392 · 24 patents
- Classic Auto Air Manufacturing LP #12,393 · 24 patents
- Comcast Cable Holdings, LLC #12,394 · 24 patents
Leaders in A45C (Purses)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Catalyst's primary technology class.
Catalyst's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 10th percentile higher than 10% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 4 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 5 | 20.8% |
| 2020 | 10 | 41.7% |
| 2023 | 4 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 4.2% |
Which technologies does Catalyst Medium Four, Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Catalyst Medium Four, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Catalyst Medium Four, Inc.'s lead technology class is A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags), 16.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45C
- Ranked #12,382 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Catalyst Medium Four, Inc. against Crrc Tangshan Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.