Casetext, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Casetext ranks #24,069 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #24,069
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 24%
- by Innovation Score (45.0/100)
- 19.1
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24069 · US Corporation #24,069 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,069/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Carbon Sink
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-PAR 45.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Carbon Sink Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Casetext’s 45.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Casetext
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Casetext · this assignee
Casetext · this assignee
45 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Casetext's Innovation Score is 45.0/100 (top 24% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Casetext?
Each dot is one of Casetext’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Casetext’s own 19.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Casetext's grants concentrate
Casetext, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Casetext sits between Carbon Sink Inc. and Cellview Imaging Inc..
Casetext's three-year grant acceleration
Casetext, Inc. shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Casetext's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Carbon Sink
Carbon Sink Inc.
11 patents
- Cardomon Internat…
Cardomon International Limited
11 patents
- Carepredict
CarePredict, Inc.
11 patents
- Carpenter Technol…
Carpenter Technology Corporation
11 patents
- Catalytic Combust…
Catalytic Combustion Corporation
11 patents
- Ceelox Patents
Ceelox Patents, LLC
11 patents
- Cellepathy
Cellepathy Inc.
11 patents
- Cellview Imaging
Cellview Imaging Inc.
11 patents
- Casetext ◀
Casetext, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Casetext holds 11 patents at rank #24,119, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Casetext
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,119 in granted patent volume.
- Carbon Sink Inc. #24,115 · 11 patents
- Cardomon International Limited #24,116 · 11 patents
- CarePredict, Inc. #24,117 · 11 patents
- Carpenter Technology Corporation #24,118 · 11 patents
- Catalytic Combustion Corporation #24,120 · 11 patents
- Ceelox Patents, LLC #24,121 · 11 patents
- Cellepathy Inc. #24,122 · 11 patents
- Cellview Imaging Inc. #24,123 · 11 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Casetext's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Casetext's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | 7 | 63.6% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 27.3% |
Which technologies does Casetext, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Casetext, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Casetext, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #24,069 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Casetext, Inc. against Carbon Sink Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 45.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.