Where does Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited ranks #39,346 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited hold?

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2020, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited's Innovation Score?

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited has an Innovation Score of 25.3 out of 100 (17th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited's recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited's patents?

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited's patents average 19.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited

Q: What technology areas does Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited focus on?

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited's top technology area is G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 3 patents, ranking #398 of 1,420 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cascade ranks #39,346 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.

#39,346
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 17th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.3/100): 19.2
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39346 · Foreign Corporation #39,346 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #39,346/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Caris Life Sciences…
CPC-NARROW G01M · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 25.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Caris Life Sciences Switzerland Holdings GMBH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cascade’s 25.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (26%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.1 pts (28%) Claim depth 11.5 pts (45%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cascade Holdings · this assignee

25
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Cascade's Innovation Score is 25.3/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cascade?

Each dot is one of Cascade’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cascade’s own 19.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cascade vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cascade's grants concentrate

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). By volume, Cascade sits between Caris Life Sciences Switzerland Holdings GMBH and Cathay (Jinxiang). Biomaterial Co., Ltd..

Caris Life Scienc…

6
Carl Zeiss Vision…

6
Carogusto

6
Carp Solutions

6
Casemed Engineeri…

6
Cassava Sciences

6
Caterpiller

6
Cathay (Jinxiang)…

6
Cascade Holdings ◀

6

What this shows Cascade holds 6 patents at rank #39,514, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cascade

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,514 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR Structures)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cascade's primary technology class.

Cascade's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	2	33.3%
2019	2	33.3%
2020	2	33.3%

Which technologies does Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited patent most?

G01M - Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited's lead technology class is G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01M
Ranked #39,346 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Cascade Technologies Holdings Limited against Caris Life Sciences Switzerland Holdings GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 25.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.