Overall rank by patents
#39,504
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2015–2017. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B60B (VEHICLE WHEELS ; CASTORS; AXLES FOR WHEELS OR CASTORS; INCREASING WHEEL ADHESION).
The verdict
Carbon holds 6 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #39,504 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Carbon Revolution Pty Ltd. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2015 and 2017, placing Carbon Revolution Pty Ltd. at rank #39,504 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 7.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in B60B (VEHICLE WHEELS ; CASTORS; AXLES FOR WHEELS OR CASTORS; INCREASING WHEEL ADHESION). As a Foreign Corporation, Carbon Revolution Pty Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Carbon sits between Capped Out Media (6 patents, rank #39,500) and Care Essentials Pty Ltd (6 patents, rank #39,508) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 19.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Carbon Revolution Pty Ltd.'s 7.7 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Carbon Revolution Pty Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Capped Out Media
6 patents
Capsule8, Inc.
6 patents
Captive-Aire Systems, Inc.
6 patents
Caracal International, LLC
6 patents
Carbon3D, Inc.
6 patents
Carbonics Inc.
6 patents
Cardinal IP Holding, LLC
6 patents
Care Essentials Pty Ltd
6 patents
Carbon Revolution Pty Ltd.
6 patents
What this shows Carbon holds 6 patents at rank #39,504, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,504 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Carbon's primary technology class.
Carbon's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 Top 94% higher than 6% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#39,504
Across all tracked assignees
19.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Carbon's 6 grants land it in the top 94% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.