CAN Technologies, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A23K (Fodder).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, CAN ranks #18,461 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 13 technology areas.
- #18,461
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 11%
- by Innovation Score (51.6/100)
- 15.5
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R18461 · US Corporation #18,461 · 15 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
- MID-PACK #18,461/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Broadridge Financial…
- CPC-FOCUS A23K · 13 areas
- INNOV-PAR 51.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How CAN’s 51.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around CAN
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- CAN · this assignee
CAN · this assignee
52 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows CAN's Innovation Score is 51.6/100 (top 11% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for CAN?
Each dot is one of CAN’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). CAN’s own 15.5 claims/patent is at or below the 17.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where CAN's grants concentrate
CAN Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 93.3% of grants classified under A23K (Fodder). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, CAN sits between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Caruse Design, Inc..
CAN's three-year grant acceleration
CAN Technologies, Inc. shows 9 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at CAN's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Broadridge Financ…
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
15 patents
- Brock University
Brock University
15 patents
- C C Jensen A/S
C.C. Jensen A/S
15 patents
- Cailabs
CAILabs
15 patents
- CAR Mate MFG
CAR Mate MFG. Co., Ltd.
15 patents
- Cardiothrive
Cardiothrive, Inc.
15 patents
- Cardlab APS
Cardlab APS
15 patents
- Caruse Design
Caruse Design, Inc.
15 patents
- CAN ◀
CAN Technologies, Inc.
15 patents
What this shows CAN holds 15 patents at rank #18,461, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near CAN
By rank, the assignees closest to #18,461 in granted patent volume.
- Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. #18,457 · 15 patents
- Brock University #18,458 · 15 patents
- C.C. Jensen A/S #18,459 · 15 patents
- CAILabs #18,460 · 15 patents
- CAR Mate MFG. Co., Ltd. #18,462 · 15 patents
- Cardiothrive, Inc. #18,463 · 15 patents
- Cardlab APS #18,464 · 15 patents
- Caruse Design, Inc. #18,465 · 15 patents
Leaders in A23K (Fodder)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CAN's primary technology class.
CAN's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
52 Top 11% higher than 89% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2021 | 2 | 13.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 13.3% |
| 2024 | 6 | 40.0% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does CAN Technologies, Inc. patent most?
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
CAN Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- CAN Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is A23K (Fodder), 93.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A23K
- Ranked #18,461 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare CAN Technologies, Inc. against Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 51.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.