Where does Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. ranks #9,216 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. hold?

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. holds 34 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2024, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 39.0 out of 100 (top 39% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. focus on?

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 31 patents, ranking #1,441 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +178% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.'s patents?

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.'s patents average 18.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 34 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cambridge ranks #9,216 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 34 patents across 8 technology areas.

#9,216
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 39%
by Innovation Score (39.0/100): 18.0
avg claims per patent: +178%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9216 · Foreign Corporation #9,216 · 34 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 34 grants
UPPER-Q #9,216/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cabela's
CPC-NARROW G06F · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 39.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +178% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cabela's LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cambridge’s 39.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.3 pts (32%) Velocity 5.9 pts (15%) Breadth 10.0 pts (26%) Claim depth 10.8 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Arity International · near

39
Cambridge Touch · this assignee

39
Cardio Flow · near

39
Minnetronix · near

39
JPW Industries · near

39
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Cambridge's Innovation Score is 39.0/100 (top 39% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cambridge?

Each dot is one of Cambridge’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cambridge’s own 18.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cambridge vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cambridge's grants concentrate

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 91.2% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Cambridge sits between Chungbuk National University Industry-academic Cooperation Foundation and Carebay Europe Ltd.

Cambridge's three-year grant acceleration

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. shows 15 grants in 2022–2024 against only 17 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Chungbuk National…

34
Clari

34
Clay Paky S p A

34
Cabela's

34
Canary Medical

34
Canon Information…

34
Canrig Robotic AS

34
Carebay Europe

34
Cambridge Touch ◀

34

What this shows Cambridge holds 34 patents at rank #9,227, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cambridge

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,227 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cambridge's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Cambridge, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Cambridge ranks #1,441 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (39 here).

Arity International Limited 39 Minnetronix, Inc. 39 Cardio Flow, Inc. 39 JPW Industries Inc. 39

Cambridge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

39 Top 39% higher than 61% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	2	5.9%
2019	7	20.6%
2020	6	17.6%
2021	4	11.8%
2022	11	32.4%
2023	3	8.8%
2024	1	2.9%

Which technologies does Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 31

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 3

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 1

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

H10N - Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

B60K - Arrangement OR Mounting OF Propulsion Units OR OF Transmissions IN VEHICLES; Arrangement OR Mounting OF Plural Diverse Prime-movers IN VEHICLES; Auxiliary Drives FOR VEHICLES; Instrumentation OR Dashboards FOR VEHICLES; Arrangements IN Connection With Cooling, AIR Intake, GAS Exhaust OR Fuel Supply 1

H04M - Telephonic Communication 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 91.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #9,216 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Cambridge Touch Technologies Ltd. against Chungbuk National University Industry-academic Cooperation Foundation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 39.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.