USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Caloris Engineering, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01D (Separation).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Caloris ranks #39,292 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 7 technology areas.

#39,292
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
16th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.1/100)
15.0
avg claims per patent
-80%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39292 · US Corporation #39,292 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #39,292/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH California Exotic…
  • CPC-NARROW B01D · 7 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 25.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -80% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: California Exotic Novelties LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Caloris’s 25.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Caloris

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Caloris's Innovation Score is 25.1/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Caloris?

Each dot is one of Caloris’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Caloris’s own 15.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Caloris vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cytac Technology Limited - 6, 6.67Cytac TechnologyCaP Biomaterials, LLC - 6, 13.5Cap BiomaterialsCalPortland Company - 6, 10CalportlandCalifornia Exotic Novelties LLC - 6, 9.83California Exotic…Cambridge Blockchain, Inc. - 6, 26.83Cambridge Blockch…Cambridge Heatwear Limited - 6, 12Cambridge HeatwearCambridge Resonant Technologies Ltd. - 6, 22.67Cambridge ResonantCambrionix Holdings Limited - 6, 1Cambrionix Holdin…Caloris Engineering, LLC - 6, 15Caloris Engineeri…
Caloris vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Caloris's grants concentrate

Caloris Engineering, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under B01D (Separation). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Caloris sits between Cytac Technology Limited and Cambrionix Holdings Limited.

Who files at Caloris's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Caloris holds 6 patents at rank #39,484, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Caloris

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,484 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B01D (Separation)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Caloris's primary technology class.

Caloris's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 2016201820192020 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Caloris Engineering, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 16.7%
2018 2 33.3%
2019 2 33.3%
2020 1 16.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Caloris Engineering, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Caloris Engineering, LLC's lead technology class is B01D (Separation), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01D
  • Ranked #39,292 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Caloris Engineering, LLC against Cytac Technology Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 25.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.