Overall rank by patents
#26,013
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 21 technology areas, active 2015–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A01G (HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING).
The verdict
California holds 10 US patents across 21 technology areas, rank #26,013 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
California State University Fresno Foundation has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2015 and 2024, placing California State University Fresno Foundation at rank #26,013 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 21 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 9.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in A01G (HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING). As a US Corporation, California State University Fresno Foundation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, California sits between Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (10 patents, rank #26,009) and Carna Biosciences, Inc. (10 patents, rank #26,017) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 32.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 7 in the 2015–2019 window, a -57% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. California State University Fresno Foundation's 9.1 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while a multi-domain presence across 21 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark California State University Fresno Foundation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
10 patents
Calabrio, Inc.
10 patents
Calcula Technologies, Inc.
10 patents
Caleffi S.P.A.
10 patents
CallMiner, Inc.
10 patents
Capitalogix IP Owner, LLC
10 patents
Captricity, Inc.
10 patents
Carna Biosciences, Inc.
10 patents
California State University Fresno Foundation
10 patents
What this shows California holds 10 patents at rank #26,013, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
California's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 Top 60% higher than 40% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2016 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 10.0% |
Top 15 of 21 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#26,013
Across all tracked assignees
32.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
California's 10 grants land it in the top 60% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.