Where does Biglobe Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Biglobe Inc. ranks #19,515 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Biglobe Inc. hold?

Biglobe Inc. holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2019, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is Biglobe Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Biglobe Inc. has an Innovation Score of 28.1 out of 100 (26th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Biglobe Inc. focus on?

Biglobe Inc.'s top technology area is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks) with 6 patents, ranking #1,967 of 5,904 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is Biglobe Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Biglobe Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Biglobe Inc.'s patents?

Biglobe Inc.'s patents average 11.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Biglobe Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Biglobe Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Biglobe ranks #19,515 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 11 technology areas.

#19,515
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 26th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.1/100): 11.8
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19515 · Foreign Corporation #19,515 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #19,515/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Bell and Howell
CPC-FOCUS H04W · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.1/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Bell and Howell, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Biglobe’s 28.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (33%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.7 pts (41%) Claim depth 7.1 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Biglobe · this assignee

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Biglobe's Innovation Score is 28.1/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Biglobe?

Each dot is one of Biglobe’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Biglobe’s own 11.8 claims/patent is at or below the 15.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Biglobe vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Biglobe's grants concentrate

Biglobe Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Biglobe sits between Bell and Howell, LLC and Blended Wing Aircraft, Inc..

Bell and Howell

14
Benecke-kaliko

14
Berry Metal

14
Beyond Innovation…

14
Biomimetic Therap…

14
Biochar Now

14
Bitglass

14
Blended Wing Airc…

14
Biglobe ◀

14

What this shows Biglobe holds 14 patents at rank #19,529, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Biglobe

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,529 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Biglobe's primary technology class.

Biglobe's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Biglobe Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	6	42.9%
2016	2	14.3%
2017	4	28.6%
2019	2	14.3%

Which technologies does Biglobe Inc. patent most?

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 6

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 5

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 5

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 1

Y02D - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN Information AND Communication Technologies [ICT], I.E. Information AND Communication Technologies Aiming AT THE Reduction OF Their OWN Energy USE 1

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 1

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 1

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Biglobe Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Biglobe Inc.'s lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 42.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
Ranked #19,515 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Biglobe Inc. against Bell and Howell, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.