Biegert & Funk Product GmbH & Co. KG
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G04C (Electromechanical Clocks OR Watches).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Biegert ranks #34,466 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #34,466
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 4th percentile
- by Innovation Score (17.2/100)
- 4.9
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R34466 · Foreign Corporation #34,466 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #34,466/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Bernhard Foerster
- CPC-NARROW G04C · 4 areas
- INNOV-LOW 17.2/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Bernhard Foerster GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Biegert’s 17.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Biegert
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Biegert & Funk… · this assignee 17
Biegert & Funk… · this assignee
17 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Biegert's Innovation Score is 17.2/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Biegert?
Each dot is one of Biegert’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Biegert’s own 4.9 claims/patent is at or below the 16.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Biegert's grants concentrate
Biegert & Funk Product GmbH & Co. KG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 14.3% of grants classified under G04C (Electromechanical Clocks OR Watches). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2015. By volume, Biegert sits between Bernhard Foerster GmbH and Bikam Pharmaceuticals Inc..
Who files at Biegert's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Bernhard Foerster
Bernhard Foerster GmbH
7 patents
- Beta-o2
Beta-O2 Technologies Ltd.
7 patents
- Beyond Identity
Beyond Identity, Inc.
7 patents
- Beyond Imagination
Beyond Imagination Inc.
7 patents
- Bifold Fluidpower
Bifold Fluidpower Limited
7 patents
- Big Time Jersey
Big Time Jersey, LLC
7 patents
- Bigid
BigID Inc.
7 patents
- Bikam Pharmaceuti…
Bikam Pharmaceuticals Inc.
7 patents
- Biegert & Funk Pr… ◀
Biegert & Funk Product GmbH & Co. KG
7 patents
What this shows Biegert holds 7 patents at rank #34,523, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Biegert
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,523 in granted patent volume.
- Bernhard Foerster GmbH #34,519 · 7 patents
- Beta-O2 Technologies Ltd. #34,520 · 7 patents
- Beyond Identity, Inc. #34,521 · 7 patents
- Beyond Imagination Inc. #34,522 · 7 patents
- Bifold Fluidpower Limited #34,524 · 7 patents
- Big Time Jersey, LLC #34,525 · 7 patents
- BigID Inc. #34,526 · 7 patents
- Bikam Pharmaceuticals Inc. #34,527 · 7 patents
Leaders in G04C (Electromechanical Clocks OR Watches)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Biegert's primary technology class.
- The Swatch Group Research and Development Ltd 122 in class
- Casio Computer Co., Ltd. 108 in class
- ETA SA Manufacture HORLOGÈRE Suisse 93 in class
- Seiko Instruments Inc. 45 in class
- Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. 36 in class
- Montres Breguet S.A. 16 in class
- Garmin Switzerland GmbH 9 in class
- Timex Group USA, Inc. 8 in class
Biegert's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2016 | 4 | 57.1% |
Which technologies does Biegert & Funk Product GmbH & Co. KG patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Biegert & Funk Product GmbH & Co. KG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Biegert & Funk Product GmbH & Co. KG's lead technology class is G04C (Electromechanical Clocks OR Watches), 14.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G04C
- Ranked #34,466 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Biegert & Funk Product GmbH & Co. KG against Bernhard Foerster GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 17.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.