BI Science (2009) Ltd
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, BI ranks #20,824 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #20,824
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 22%
- by Innovation Score (45.8/100)
- 13.4
- avg claims per patent
- +400%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R20824 · Foreign Corporation #20,824 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #20,824/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Beijing Kingsoft…
- CPC-NARROW G06Q · 6 areas
- INNOV-PAR 45.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +400% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Beijing Kingsoft Cloud Network Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How BI’s 45.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around BI
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- BI Science (2009) · this assignee
BI Science (2009) · this assignee
46 score
- Humanetics Innovativ… · near
Humanetics Innovativ… · near
46 score
- Tubitak · near
Tubitak · near
46 score
- Universiteit van… · near
Universiteit van… · near
46 score
- William Beaumont… · near
William Beaumont… · near
46 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows BI's Innovation Score is 45.8/100 (top 22% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for BI?
Each dot is one of BI’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). BI’s own 13.4 claims/patent is at or below the 13.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where BI's grants concentrate
BI Science (2009) Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 69.2% of grants classified under G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, BI sits between Beijing Kingsoft Cloud Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Biogen Chesapeake LLC.
BI's three-year grant acceleration
BI Science (2009) Ltd shows 9 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at BI's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Beijing Kingsoft…
Beijing Kingsoft Cloud Network Technology Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- Beijing Kingsoft…
Beijing Kingsoft Cloud Technology Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- Beijing Shunyuan…
Beijing Shunyuan Kaihua Technology Limited
13 patents
- Bevara
Bevara Technologies, LLC
13 patents
- Billie
Billie, Inc.
13 patents
- Bioelectron Techn…
Bioelectron Technology Corporation
13 patents
- Biofreeze IP Hold…
Biofreeze IP Holdings, LLC
13 patents
- Biogen Chesapeake
Biogen Chesapeake LLC
13 patents
- BI Science (2009) ◀
BI Science (2009) Ltd
13 patents
What this shows BI holds 13 patents at rank #20,813, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near BI
By rank, the assignees closest to #20,813 in granted patent volume.
- Beijing Kingsoft Cloud Network Technology Co., Ltd. #20,809 · 13 patents
- Beijing Kingsoft Cloud Technology Co., Ltd. #20,810 · 13 patents
- Beijing Shunyuan Kaihua Technology Limited #20,811 · 13 patents
- Bevara Technologies, LLC #20,812 · 13 patents
- Billie, Inc. #20,814 · 13 patents
- Bioelectron Technology Corporation #20,815 · 13 patents
- Biofreeze IP Holdings, LLC #20,816 · 13 patents
- Biogen Chesapeake LLC #20,817 · 13 patents
Leaders in G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in BI's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 6,621 in class
- Google LLC 3,295 in class
- Capital ONE Services, LLC 3,005 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 2,993 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 2,990 in class
- Facebook, Inc. 1,919 in class
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 1,697 in class
- Mastercard International Incorporated 1,644 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for BI, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…), BI ranks #1,413 of 6,520 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (46 here).
BI's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
46 Top 22% higher than 78% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2021 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2022 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2023 | 4 | 30.8% |
| 2024 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 7.7% |
Which technologies does BI Science (2009) Ltd patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
BI Science (2009) Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- BI Science (2009) Ltd's lead technology class is G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,), 69.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06Q
- Ranked #20,824 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare BI Science (2009) Ltd against Beijing Kingsoft Cloud Network Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 45.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.