Overall rank by patents
#28,242
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Bi-mirth ranks #28,242 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 2 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28242 · Foreign Corporation #28,242 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Best Theratronics Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Bi-mirth · this assignee
37 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Bi-mirth's Innovation Score is 37.4/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Bi-mirth Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Bi-mirth sits between Best Theratronics Ltd. and Biolab Sanus Farmaceutica Ltda.
Bi-mirth Corp. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Best Theratronics Ltd.
9 patents
Beth-el Zikhron Yaaqov Industries Ltd.
9 patents
Beyeonics Surgical Ltd.
9 patents
BGI Tech Solutions Co., Ltd
9 patents
Billiontoone, Inc.
9 patents
Bind Therapeutics, Inc.
9 patents
Bio-path Holdings, Inc.
9 patents
Biolab Sanus Farmaceutica Ltda
9 patents
Bi-mirth Corp.
9 patents
What this shows Bi-mirth holds 9 patents at rank #28,217, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,217 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Bi-mirth's primary technology class.
Bi-mirth's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2017 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2022 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2023 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 11.1% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#28,242
of 49,997 tracked assignees
37.4 out of 100
What to do with this data
Bi-mirth Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.