Where does Bi-mirth Corp. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Bi-mirth Corp. ranks #28,242 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Bi-mirth Corp. hold?

Bi-mirth Corp. holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Bi-mirth Corp.'s Innovation Score?

Bi-mirth Corp. has an Innovation Score of 37.4 out of 100 (top 44% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Bi-mirth Corp.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Bi-mirth Corp.'s recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Bi-mirth Corp.'s patents?

Bi-mirth Corp.'s patents average 7.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Bi-mirth Corp. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Bi-mirth Corp.

Q: What technology areas does Bi-mirth Corp. focus on?

Bi-mirth Corp.'s top technology area is F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing) with 9 patents, ranking #134 of 2,095 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Bi-mirth ranks #28,242 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 2 technology areas.

#28,242
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 44%
by Innovation Score (37.4/100): 7.4
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28242 · Foreign Corporation #28,242 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #28,242/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Best Theratronics
CPC-NARROW F16B · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.4/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Best Theratronics Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Bi-mirth’s 37.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (21%) Velocity 20.0 pts (53%) Breadth 5.0 pts (13%) Claim depth 4.5 pts (12%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Bi-mirth · this assignee

37
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Bi-mirth's Innovation Score is 37.4/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Bi-mirth?

Each dot is one of Bi-mirth’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Bi-mirth’s own 7.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Bi-mirth vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Bi-mirth's grants concentrate

Bi-mirth Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Bi-mirth sits between Best Theratronics Ltd. and Biolab Sanus Farmaceutica Ltda.

Bi-mirth's three-year grant acceleration

Bi-mirth Corp. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Best Theratronics

9
Beth-el Zikhron Y…

9
Beyeonics Surgical

9
BGI Tech Solutions

9
Billiontoone

9
Bind Therapeutics

9
Bio-path Holdings

9
Biolab Sanus Farm…

9
Bi-mirth ◀

9

What this shows Bi-mirth holds 9 patents at rank #28,217, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Bi-mirth

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,217 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Bi-mirth's primary technology class.

Bi-mirth's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Bi-mirth Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	11.1%
2017	1	11.1%
2018	1	11.1%
2019	1	11.1%
2022	2	22.2%
2023	2	22.2%
2025partial year	1	11.1%

Which technologies does Bi-mirth Corp. patent most?

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 9

B21H - Making Particular Metal Objects BY Rolling, e.g. Screws, Wheels, Rings, Barrels, Balls 1

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Bi-mirth Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Bi-mirth Corp.'s lead technology class is F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16B
Ranked #28,242 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Bi-mirth Corp. against Best Theratronics Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.